Hello guys, today I wanted to talk about a project I deeply care about and I'm actively contributing to, as I believe its good for everyone, including privacy concerned users

Ladybird Browser

This browser comes from the project "SerenityOS", and has since evolved and separated from it. The founders are Andreas Kling, and Chris Wanstrath. The main goal of this project is to create a browser from scratch, avoiding chromium, gecko, etc. The main keypoints that should be of interest for Privacy Oriented Users are the following:

  • Ladybird lead (Andreas Kling) states "We're not monetizing users, in any way. This is uncharted territory for browsers. So we're not going to do any default search deals. We're not going to do cryptocurrencies or try to monetize user data, just sponsorships and donations"

  • While** Ladybird will implement current web standards including cookie handling and tracking mechanisms for compatibility**, the browser's philosophy puts the user in control of these decisions, not the company. The browser won't have built-in incentives to encourage data collection since it doesn't profit from it.

  • It aims to be "free from advertising's influence" Ladybird, representing a shift away from the current web ecosystem where users like us are the product. This allows the project to implement privacy features without worrying about harming advertising partners or revenue streams.

As of now, the project has hired several developers with money coming from donations, from partners such as FUTO, Shopify, Cloudflare, among many, and is also seeing lots of volunteer activity on github. So well, if you like the web having more diversity and us having another alternative to google, check them out https://ladybird.org/

top 57 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 51 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I hope they come out with extension support immediately and uBO follows up with compatibility after.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Extension support is basically a minimum requirement for me (especially uBO, but also some others like Bypass Paywalls Clean, FastStream, and SponsorBlock). They can add overhead to the browser, but if the browser itself is solid and as efficient as they are pushing for. Then I can handle knowing that any extra RAM or processes are my fault. I imagine that if they truly keep all the data collection and telemetry we see in other browsers. Then the overhead of extensions might just make resources only about as bad as a clean install of the others without extensions. Which would still be a win in my book. Even if they don't have extensions, it will still be fun to have around and see how it evolves over time. Might even inspire folks to try doing the hardest part of making new browsers instead of endless forks that are at the whim of the base they came from.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I'm sure they'll get extension support at some point. They also said they intend to add a built in adblocker

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I don't mind an adblocker extension installed by default (for non tech-minded users), but a built in adblocker is just irritating. I want to have control over which extensions I use. Building an adblocker into the browser just takes more development time, and reduces freedom for everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    having a pre-installed adblock extension is also a great way to dogfood the extension implementation, whereas if it's a built-in adblocker it's likely to use a bunch of special privileged code and when extension developers complain about being unable to do things the browser devs will just say "yeah we can't be bothered to fix this, just use the built-in adblocker dude"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    There's also !Servo@programming.dev browser engine that is being actively developed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What do companies like Shopify hope to gain from this?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago

    When I first became aware of this project I was pretty dismissive.

    I'm very happy to admit in this case that the project has come further than I thought it would.

    Their FAQ says they have 8, paid, full time devs and resources for something like 18 months. IDK how much it really takes to get a browser off the ground but they've got something, at least.

    I'm looking forward to their Alpha release in 2026, and really hope they can achieve that.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    How soon might it be ready to use?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 1 year ago

    Alpha is expected sometime 2026 (but far from perfect) A more polished now beta, in 2027 And if all goes well, the first 1.0 release in 2028

    Still, probably for most people it won't be worth using until the beta releases, or even until 1.0

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Will ladybird be the Linux of my disappointment, or the Cinnamon of my dreams?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Looking forward to try it in Summer 2026. I hope long term theres going to be support for uBO, separating sessions, and maybe jxl :')

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Lady/Thunder/Betterbird seem excellent.
    What other fowl software is worth a try?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sounds cool! Is it in a useful state?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    It's so far from being ready. I built it on void recently and well, it ran, but it was very bare bones. At this stage I still prefer netsurf.

    Looking forward to the finished product.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    if you want a browser made by a transphobe just use brave

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Who are browsers usually built for? Dogs?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I've donated to them before, but I remember some anti-LGBTQ+ issues from one of the lead developers I think a few years ago. Has that been addressed?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I believe the project has been parked on neutrality and common respect for a while, the biggest "controversy" I know of is that the lead developer and founder said something about hiring back when he worked at apple, based on inclusivity vs talent, being a bad way of doing things, and people went crazy over that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago

    The controversy was about a pull request being submitted that changed documentation to have gender-neutral pronouns, and there was some back and forth with the lead dev about not making “political” statements. Also lead dev is German and apparently (just what I have been told) in German the male pronouns are used when making gender-neutral references; so that muddied the waters of the back and forth - he may have assumed he was doing intended grammar in English and others may have assumed he was fighting against inclusivity (which as been going around a lot lately, in case that was not obvious…)

    As far as I know it was eventually straightened out and the changes were implemented

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Are they going to cram a bunch of AI bullshit into it like Mozilla is doing with Firefox?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 15 points 1 year ago*

    Companies and organizations earn money by selling user data from these intrusive AIs, and ladybird is the complete opposite, so I doubt it, probably the closest thing to that will be allowing users to have their preferred AI linked on the sidebar, which is normal and non-intrusive by itself

    Edit: Some companies earn even more money just by keeping investors happy with this AI bubble

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    is this the browser with the terfy devs

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -20 points 1 year ago (16 children)
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [+] -12 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    This graph is terrible for proving your point. Which browsers are ... ?

    • building a new engine and/or rewritting old code; instead of just being another fork/reskin of browser xyz;
    • still active, with expectations of continuing for the next few years; with funding from people and companies;
    • doing rapid advances towards being a good enough replacement of Chrome, Firefox, Safari;

    This graphs says nothing of that.

    edit: autocorrect

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Lol, this graphic is not relevant here.
    HTML is the standard, ladybird isn't changing the standard, they're creating a web browser to comply with the standard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    They're creating their own web browsing privacy standard

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    That does not mean it won't be compliant with the current standard.

    You're really channeling the scumbag depicted in your avatar with your disingenuous framing of this project's mere existence as a bad thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I never said it won't be compliant with web standards. I said it will have its own privacy standards. You're really channeling the scumbag depicted in my avatar by twisting up my words.

    Im not saying they should halt the project. Im not sayin we don't need more browsers. Im not saying this is doomed to fail. Im not saying it will succeed.

    But its another browser among hundreds of other browsers. They're all mostly compliant with web standards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    But the difference is is that only a few browsers are what you'd call successful (chrome, safari, firefox). If the new one catches on, it's a needed contribution, not "just another standard"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    To be fair, currently most web browsers are based either in Firefox or chromium. In the past Opera used to have its own engine, and the same applied for other browsers.

    I'm fine with current efforts on ladybird and servo.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 year ago

    We as of now don't have an issue with having too many browsers (we have to many chromium and firefox forks), but not independent browsers.

    Also, ladybird started of trying to build all libraries from scratch, leading to the problem you mention, but they rectified, now they are doing all browser related, but using common libraries for stuff that isnt a browser competency per se

  • source
  • parent