Opening my weather app this morning I was greeted by this warning:

Google has announced that, starting in 2026/2027, all apps on certified Android devices will require the developer to submit personal identity details directly to Google. Since the developers of this app do not agree to this requirement, this app will no longer work on certified Android devices after that time.

It's the first time I hear about this, seems to be about:

Tech crunch article from august, "google will require developer verification for android apps outside the play store"

Cirrus app: Github

Was this a big thing I somehow missed? I hope more devs will follow suit.

top 82 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 142 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Yes, you must have missed it. And so it begins.

Google is moving to make Android less open source. I'm not sure more devs following suit is going be good for them or their users. The G doesn't give an F.

What we need is an OS fork that gets maintained. If not that, some other workaround that fools the Google servers. Because you can bet money that nobody made from flesh and blood is going to look at this inside Google.

Maybe devs can band together and form Middle Finger Corp. and designate one willing person as their contact to serve as registered dev for a gazillion apps. Follow the letter of the law, not the misguided spirit of it, in a manner of speaking.

If you are sitting on a mobile OS and you were afraid to fail like Windows, maybe now is the time to give it a go?

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago (17 children)
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    e/OS too, if Graphene fails or isn't available. Or Murena.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Murena has had questionable policies....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    And what policies would that be?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -30 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Kids these days won't search answers on the internet...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I'm an adult, and promise you I've been using computers longer than you've been alive, and I still don't care to waste what little time I have on this planet to look into shit that sounds completely made-up.

    Put up, or shut up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Kids these days is a classic thing to say. Nowadays it doesn't impjy that the listener is a kid

    Edit: I can offer you https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/114880919351954282 and https://sopuli.xyz/post/21908818

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Okay, so backing up your claims with other peoples unbased claims. Thanks! What does EU funding (once again no source for this claim) have to do with policies?

    The one point that speaks against /e/OS is the slow updates yes, but that's not a "policy" thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    I searched for Murena's policies and found a privacy policy page, and it seems fine?? You give them information for transactions, they don't sell your information, and you can delete your account which will delete the information they have on you.

    What more do you want?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Will graphene be able to avoid this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Well for this case in particular yes, the dev will continue to develop the app on f-droid, the platform as a whole takes a hit through this though, so who knows how long they will continue out of goodwill.

    edit: Play integrity already is problematic on GrapheneOS

    The largest medicare provider in germany states legislative reasons they won't support other 3rd party OS'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    are you kidding? only available for google phones. are we supposed to give money to google for this situation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I think they are looking to partner with a phone manufacturer to move graphene platform to other brand of phones.

    Specially since it's unlikely that google pixels will keep providing the spec info and openness that GOS need to work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Hopefully this leads to a lot more development of and for Ubuntu Touch. Biggest issues it faces are lack of compatibility and lack of apps. I think the core is solid though. I used it for a week when switching from iOS (so no Android background) and enjoyed it, but a few too many minor issues built up and I ended up going to Calyx.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 76 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 16 points 1 year ago

    Thank you for these links they are fantastic! I was aware of the procedural lock in via play integrity services and also the lockdown on side loading so that didn't get past me, but I wasn't aware google also wants to alienate developers now by requiring ID. It seems to me google want to now fully commercialize the platform, transforming it into the ad infested network that web2+3.0 already became. I think their plan, by alienating non commercial devs, is that all apps will run on their ad models and non without them will be left.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Wording of the message implies it’s possible to have uncertified version of Android… Such a thing possible?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    any version of android that's not vendor or downloaded from the official android website

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yes, think cheap android tablets that are so shit google store can barely run on it. Those devices are usually chinese knockoffs and do not ship with google services, google store or any gapps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I don't believe the certified android means hardware, I believe it's only about if you have an official android build running, since if your hardware can run a custom ROM, you can get around this issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I think it has to do with the google certification you have to go through to sell hardware shipping with android. All devices need to be certified by google or they are not allowed to run gapps or connect to the playstore. This is what huawei lost after trump banned them, so they had to make their own shit as a replacement

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm going to look into adding this to my app https://git.allpurposem.at/mat/Sudoku Indeed I do not agree with this, so it will become unavailable when the terms go into effect. I will look into making it available for Linux Mobile.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 31 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    First of all thank you for providing a foss app!

    I think it's a big difference if the platform tolerates you or actively wants to stop you from doing it. You got my fullest sympathy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago

    And so it continues... Google trying to shoehorn themselves into a position of authority of the internet. Imagine they get as much sway as the banks now have? Private entities controlling the masses for massive profits. Fuck off Google.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Just to clarify:

    Will my apps installed from F-droid be unaffected by this?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Even apps installed outside the Play Store will need to have a "verified developer", and this change will affect any devices that use Google Play Services, so it will be a problem even to old devices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If you don't have Google Play Services installed, then you're not affected. Of course, how many custom ROMs will live to that day is unknown.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    From what I gather, yes. But will you be allowed to install F-Droid? No.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I've heard that it will still be possible to install unverified apps via ADB, so theoretically it wouldn't be hard to make an app installer that uses Shizuku (tool that allows you to ADB into your own device) and have a website that automatically installs that using WebUSB or something

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Would people be able to circumvent this by downgrading their version of Google Play Services? ..or not updating it in the first place?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I think you could still adb install unverified apps into your phone.

    That untill they'll block that path too.

    Also I suppose that you'll need to adb every update. So apps that would want to go this way should self check updates instead of relying on an external store.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    They're baking this right in the package installer of android, it goes beyond play services. I have my doubts that this will pass in the EU

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    But that begs the same question. If you never update your existing phone with google's malware, you should be ok.

    Obviously if you buy a new phone that's already infected you're screwed unless you can flash a new ROM on there.

    My point is. People's current phones do not have this malware on it yet. If you disable updates and/or degoogle, your device should continue to work as is. Perhaps without being able to use Google Play Store, but honestly that's not huge loss for anyone that cares about this stuff in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    True, but using a phone and never updating it likely leaves you open to other malware/attacks sadly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    This news makes me actually sad. I have had high hopes in the last years in the FOSS world, having myself and three other persons move to use Linux as daily driver on Desktop/Laptop.

    My phone has FOSS apps only except for banking, health, transport tickets and 2/3 work rekated stuff. My messaging, files and pictures are handled by FOSS apps installed from third parties (F-Droid, Obtainium) on selfhosted servers... I was finally seeing the light at the end of the tunnel.

    This news sound to me like the tunnel ahaead is collapsing.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    We'll be able to install via adb hopefully.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    From what I've seen elsewhere, yes. adb sideloading will still be possible, but that adds a level of inconvenience many people will not enjoy, especially since FDroid and similar have been so easy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    How easy is it to convert an Android app to a Linux mobile app of you're the developer? If it's written in JVM languages it shouldn't be that hard right?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Just use a custom ROM. This sadly will affect app developers. But if you are on a custom ROM without GMS it will continue to work just fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Google is trying to kill custom ROMs too. Also I thought the majority of modern phones aren't bootloader unlockable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Ehhhh... sorta maybe. Ultimately they can't, but they can make development more difficult.

    Also Google has nothing to do with whether or not you're bootloader is unlockable. Get a phone that is.

    If you rally want to go down the whole FOSS path it does ultimately become a bit of a lifestyle.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    End-users can use e.g. waydro.id to run Android apps on Linux.

    I'm not deep into Android development, but I doubt it's possible to just port an app without basically a complete rewrite. Android has an own layer on top of the JVM, called Zygote, and there's presumably lots of system libraries which the Android apps implicitly depend on, for handling graphics and whatnot, which make tons of assumptions about running on an Android device.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I've only ever used Android, dating back to the T-Mobile G1. I think I'm now ready to switch to iPhone. If I'm going to be pigeonholed into a completely walled garden, it might as well be with a company that knows what they are doing.

    I really don't want to switch, but probably will for my next upgrade.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Screw that!
    Get a Fairphone with /e/OS before you switch to the rotten apple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I absolutely get what you're saying, and a good part of me agrees with you. Here is the thing, I'm tired boss. I've made an effort my whole life to use open source, privacy friendly everything.

    I'm now to the point where I don't have time for messing with phones. Fixing broken stuff, compatibility, etc etc.

    I need a powerful phone with a great camera that just works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I switched to iPhone in 2016. I had no idea Pixel was coming, and my choices all sucked. The more I looked at the iPhone 6s, the more I realized it was the right phone at that time.

    I’m now on my fourth iPhone and I’m kind of done with them. “Apple Intelligence” and the keyboard gets so many things wrong. On a 16 Pro Max. And yet my Galaxy S10 which is 5 years older gets almost nothing wrong.

    iPhones have great screens and the newest Snapdragon barely catches up to the new iPhone chip. But I think it does more. The Pixel chip is much further behind (comparable to an iPhone 11, I hear) but even that phone seems smarter.

    I feel like iPhones are really nice basic/feature phones. They work well with my Macs, but Macs don’t stop working if your phone runs Android. They just don’t play well together.

    Apple is a lot better on privacy. They never pretended to be or care about open source though. iOS is based on macOS which is certified UNIX; Android is Linux more or less but neither is open. I think it's a moot point at best and a bullshit non-point most days. Open source I mean. As far as privacy, I think Apple is better on a good day but maybe misleading, but Google never really pretended to care. The deal was always, premium stuff for your personal data. We just didn’t care as much back then.

    Honestly there are no great options. If I had to buy a phone right now, I’d probably get a Galaxy S25. I just hate what’s going on with Nova Launcher. But I love using my S10, it’s just a dated screen at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Where are you linux hardware manufacturers ?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I think Google wants someone to go after if malware gets pushed onto the Play Store.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments