all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 50 points 1 year ago

The sudden, instantaneous centralization of almost all the major video news networks under this one dude is pretty transparent. The oligarchs know they now have a rubber stamp in office.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Who even cares anymore. They're all collaborators, journalism is dead

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's strange to see some of the same faces and mouthpieces still at these networks from years ago. Do they know things have changed? Have they always been "in on it"? Or do they just not care/want the pay?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    They probably went into reporting either for romantic sentiments or because they wanted to be on tv. And I think that's still mostly true, the on location reporters tend to honestly report what's happening in front of them

    But as their career progresses and they get better gigs, they're given more orders. You can sometimes see an on location reporter be taken aback and clam up when the anchor asks them a leading question, but by the time they're doing interviews with political figures they're given topics to hit or avoid and a tone

    By the time they're behind a desk, they apparently are just fired if they slightly deviate from the message these days

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago