all 31 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 1 year ago

I literally cannot explain how excited this makes me. I can't, because that'd require me to be in any way exited by any of this, as opposed to annoyed that'll I'll have to disable yet more useless bloat that doesn't belong in a web browser. And apparently waste disk space on a local LLM I won't be using, because, you know, I can fucking read on my own just fine.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    You know they could've just made official extensions for these? Good thing I'm on ESR so I won't receive these until I move to a fork.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    We really, really, really need a third party browser that isn't a Firefox or Chrome clone. This duopoly is a downward spiral.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    YOU'LL NEVER GET ME TO USE AI

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Seems like a silly statement. I mean we do not have real AI, so you basically are saying "I will not use predictive algorithms" which seems counter intuitive to using a computer at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Its abundantly obvious that nowadays when somebody mentions AI they mean generative AI for text, images, and so on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    OK, that changes nothing about what I said. Do you have a point?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I quite obviously meant it doesn't matter how much they integrate Gemini into the browser, I'm not touching it.

    I, again quite obviously, am not saying I'm not going to use any predictive algorithm ever made.

    If this is confusing to you, consider consulting a doctor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You said or op or whoever, I will not use AI. Now you are saying in a browser and if it is gemini.

    Point is I think the problem is corporations, the training, the privacy, etc.

    Predictive algorithms could be useful eveb in a browser, generative ai could be helpful with spotting phishing, confusing ads, spelling, orgnization and layout, but it's all about who made it, who controls it, and how much energy it consumes.

    That is my point, the issues surrounding computing are not just because it is called "ai" and I think it should be said as such.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    @NewNewAugustEast @kadup @Vivaldi I am definitely going to be called a chill, but I truly and honestly love the thing I'm going to talk about, I'm not just "blowing steam"If you want a great, User-Configurable browser without any AI garbage, give Vivaldi a tryHere is the CEO giving a clear stance against generative AIvivaldi.com/blog/keep-explorinAnd here is a more general explanation of what and how they as a company is working towards a better future for the webvivaldi.com/for-a-better-web/My own experience with the browser is that it feels like what people expect Firefox to still be:A User-focused, configurable and customizable, feature-rich web-browser that puts the user first and foremost.Want the tabs at the bottom?That's a setting.Using Vivaldi on Linux in a Window-manager with server-side(or no) decorations? Don't worry, that's in the Settings.Want a keybinding that opens a predetermined set of tabs?That's possible with a command chain. Want to set alt+tab to cycle tabs? The keybinding page in the Settings is one of the best I've ever used with the ability to bind multiple keybindings to the same action (or multiple actions using command chains) And as if that wasn't enough, the CEO spends some of his time on Mastodon, and has answered questions directed to the Vivaldi accountOK, I'm a fanboy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Vivaldi is probably the only Chromium based browser I would consider. It is my alternative when I am not using Firefox. Yeah it is pretty good.

    I will say, like I mentioned about Firefox, if you scroll down in the comments you will find people saying Vivaldi will fade to obscurity without implementing some kind of AI.

    Frankly I appreciate Vivaldi's stance: it isn't ready yet, too many issues and problems to add agents into our ecosystem.

    By the way Vivaldi is like a swiss knife: you can take notes, email, calendar, tasks, so much stuff! On the other hand it often chokes on updates and the sync is less then perfect.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    just use librewolf people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I have said this before: what are they supposed to do? I don't want external AI, I don't want google lens in my browser, I don't want a lot of what they are doing.

    But Firefox is in between a rock and hard place. To the average user not having those things is seen as being behind and old. They are told every day how great AI is, and how useful it is.

    So what does Mozilla do?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    We have different distributions of Firefox at least. Dunno how feasible it would be for them to release and support a stripped down version. I'm gonna guess it's not as I would assume a lot of these integrations come with sponsorship money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    I've used Firefox since the Netscape era. I used Firefox before it reached 1.0. I supported it when it was way slower than IE or Chrome. I will not support this.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's such a shame to see the difficulty Mozilla has to find a viable business model. I understand the reactions here and agree it's appalling, but at the same time, what can they do? AFAIK they rely on Google to pay for the search engine integration. That already sucks, and is a serious existential risk. So they need to diversify, which I think is what they're attempting to do here: let companies pay for being the default "lens", LLM, weather service, etc. From a business perspective this makes a lot of sense, to reduce the risk of depending on one customer.

    It doesn't help that the c-level are just as greedy as you'd expect for any random company, raking in the millions, and arguably are doing a really bad job by being reactionary only, and then choosing the course of action that alienates the traditional user base. I don't really see any good way out of this other than radically changing their business model, e.g., going full non-profit, and move to a subscription model for revenue. But that's extremely risky as well. I would definitely pay a subscription for a Firefox where the primary focus is stability, safety and speed, as opposed to new features. But, there's also a limit to what I'd be willing to pay, $1 a month seems like a no brainer, but $5 would feel steep.

    Long story short, they're in a tough spot, I feel for them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Their email mask service has been great and easy to use. I would rather hand out throw away emails that actually use mine anymore. But that alone isn't going to pay their bills because not many people even know it is an option, and even fewer are willing to pay. I can't blame them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Holy hell fuck Mozilla

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If you just want regular Firefox without Mozilla's bullshit grab Waterfox.

    If you're the more paranoid type then grab LibreWolf. It comes with a lot of privacy centric tweaks out of the box and is what I personally have used for over a year now.

    And I dunno maybe try Floorp if you feel fancy. I've never personally used it however.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Welp, so long Firefox. It has been a good run all those years.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    that's it im going from firefox to mullvand browser all.of they ai is shit

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/firefox@fedia.io view that post
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No one wants this bloat. Mozilla/Firefox needs new leadership.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Hopefully one can turn off all this new bull in about: config...

  • source