top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 1 year ago (9 children)

… as all centralized and corporate social media does.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Since bluesky is decentralised

    So you can host your own BlueSky instance and register an account on that instance?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    That was a rhetoric question.

    According to the documentation you need to verify your domain and account which makes it centralized.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    that’s what u get for using the default bsky client and pds.

  • source
  • 7 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Dump the corporate social shitholes

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You can just host your own decentralized instance, right?

    Right?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This is a mistake, they should just refuse service in all markets that do this, that's the only way you get enough public backlash to make a change

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 2 comments in c/bad_internet_bills@lemmy.sdf.org view that post
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Someone show me where twitter is complying on any level.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    chuckles in selfhosted ActivityPub server reverse-proxied thru xmr vps in eastern europe

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/technology@piefed.social view that post
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    99.5% centralized says what.

  • source