Amid reports the Justice Department is weighing banning transgender people from owning firearms in response to last month’s mass shooting at a Minneapolis Catholic church, the National Rifle Association said Friday it will oppose any blanket rule that limits Second Amendment rights.

Their declaration comes after CNN and other outlets reported that Justice Department leadership is considering whether it can use its rulemaking authority declare that people who are transgender are mentally ill and can lose their rights to possess firearms.

all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 90 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's nice to see the gun organization likes guns more than they hate trans people

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Honestly given the slippery slope of ideas like this, I’m not sure the NRA had any choice but to feel like this. Now whether they actually do anything about it is another story. It’s probably just lip service.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 112 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Weird times when the NRA and trans people share a common goal.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 94 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    The NRA is the lobby group for gun manufacturers, and trans people are relatively well-armed. They would lose sales, that's literally the entirety of their reasoning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Also, bringing attention to attempts to limit guns promotes people buying guns. So, no surprise they'd try to get publicity for this to motivate more trans people to arm themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    More trans people should arm themselves, in fairness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 49 points 1 year ago

    The NRA is a lobby group for the gun industry, and maximizing revenue through gun sales.

    This is a fucking golden moment for the NRA to get a flood of support (money spent on firearms) from the left.

    They can use the identical rhetoric about the government being jackbooted thugs, but this time they'd be accurate instead of hyperbolic.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    Next mental illness: empathy

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    Big talk. They endorsed Trump in 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association#Elections

    I'll believe it when I see it

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Not surprising. In a civil war, the only one who wins is the person selling the guns.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I thought the NRA went bankrupt?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    They have to get ahead of this. Because once it starts with trans, it'll move to another group with a bigger base. Guns gotta keep flowing for the NRA.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Whoa whoa whoa second amendment folks! Right? RIGHT?!

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    2A for all. If they've got guns, we should, too

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I mean on the one hand, you shouldn't get brownie points for just doing the most basic.

    On the other, thank fuck they're actually saying something. I would guess they are doing this bc they know this means if trans people can't buy guns, that's a loss in profits, but that's about the only thing that's going to get the wealthy to take any notice. (This is also why corporations should never have been considered people, but that's a topic for a different day).

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's also a really slippery slope when the justice department can blanket declare entire swaths of people mentally ill. Soon, anyone who doesn't vote would be banned from owning firearms due to their "Trump Derangement Syndrome" being classified as mental illness.

    I've said it before and I'll say it again. Liberals need to consider arming themselves while they still can. Guns have caused a lot of harm, but right now 90% of the guns are owned by the fascists. I'm hoping I never need guns, but I know I don't want to find out I need them after I can't get them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    I would not have called that one.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I'm positive the NRA supports the transgender ban. In their past they supported the Mulford Act when the Black Panthers were copwatching.

    My bet is they'll say second amendment today to save face and instead push for any changes to be only related to diagnosed mental illness. Then they'll be silent when the transgender community is thrown into that category during a second legislative pass.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Honestly, knowing the dire straights the NRA has been in the past 10 years or so, it wouldn't be a bad time to try and rebrand. Right wingers aren't nearly as big fans of them anymore after they've rolled over on basically every gun rights case that's come up, so I'm kinda hoping this is an actual attempt at doing something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    As a gun owner and enthusiast, I encourage all Americans to exercise their rights. Also, NRA can go to hell. They're just a huge money grab. I'm a GOA member myself.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Oppose as in, the same level of action against a ban that they have done for other restrictions in the past? Doubt.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yeah, are they lobbying Congress to oppose it? Will their NRA rating decrease if they support the ban? Are they threatening to fund primary challengers? Will there be a trans speaker at the next convention saying "from my cold dead hands"?

    There's a difference between a strongly worded letter responding to an immediate question of the day and actual action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    so far the news is only that the executive branch is pursuing this, and this news is only a few days old. This is their first response to the matter.

    No organization can move quickly enough to already be doing the things you suggest at this point. This is the make a statement of intent phase, which they have done.

    Give it time, nothing happens immediately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Why? We've seen their anemic responses to minority gun issues before (Philando Castile). There's no reason to assume good faith from an organization that's been a thinly veiled Republican PAC for decades now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Are they merely saying it? Or, ard they actually saying it? Basically, is their money behind it? Or, is this just a publicity stunt?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    If "trans lose their gun rights" becomes a headline then "all us citizens lose their gun rights" is on the next train and the NRA is almost utterly pointless. They can smell what's coming because they were on that side of the fence for far too long.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Don’t forget, on the firearm purchase application it asks if you currently or have ever smoked marijuana, which would exclude you from being allowed to purchase a weapon. I’d like to believe that question answered honestly would include almost every current firearm owner…so normal hypocrisy I suppose.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    It's currently 1:10 AM in Moscow. Wait a few hours until they get new direction from Management ....

  • source