The court has basically ruled to accept the terms proposed by Google itself. That's surely the normal thing to do and doesn't sound like corruption in the least.

I think that always happens. The court usually also gives the murder suspect the sentence that they want.

Lame

This reminds me of abusive parents in Reddit real stories, whom inferior child got hurt by the golden child , then they make execuses for the golden one

There wasn't even a slap on the wrist in that ruling.

Waiting for the Onion article "Google won't have to sell judge"

Pushing far-right influencers on YouTube finally paid off to them...

I never thought forcing Google to sell Chrome was a good idea. Most of the companies lining up to buy it were AI companies flushed with private equity money. Does anyone really think those companies would do a better job at protecting user privacy and avoiding monopolistic practices?

judge rules drools

crime is legal anyway