207
Google won’t have to sell Chrome, judge rules (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I never thought forcing Google to sell Chrome was a good idea. Most of the companies lining up to buy it were AI companies flushed with private equity money. Does anyone really think those companies would do a better job at protecting user privacy and avoiding monopolistic practices?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    While I agree with you, I wished that Mehta would entertain the idea of spinning Chrome into an independent company, even though it is still unclear to me how a browser company can generate revenue, especially to pay the salaries of the army of engineers working on Blink.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •