There wasn't even a slap on the wrist in that ruling.
post
I never thought forcing Google to sell Chrome was a good idea. Most of the companies lining up to buy it were AI companies flushed with private equity money. Does anyone really think those companies would do a better job at protecting user privacy and avoiding monopolistic practices?
While I agree with you, I wished that Mehta would entertain the idea of spinning Chrome into an independent company, even though it is still unclear to me how a browser company can generate revenue, especially to pay the salaries of the army of engineers working on Blink.
The court has basically ruled to accept the terms proposed by Google itself. That's surely the normal thing to do and doesn't sound like corruption in the least.
I think that always happens. The court usually also gives the murder suspect the sentence that they want.
This reminds me of abusive parents in Reddit real stories, whom inferior child got hurt by the golden child , then they make execuses for the golden one

all 13 comments