▲ 207 ▼ Google won’t have to sell Chrome, judge rules (arstechnica.com) submitted 1 year ago by BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 95 points 1 year ago (3 children) There wasn't even a slap on the wrist in that ruling. permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago I liked googles response statement that they disagree with the ruling and are considering their next steps. You could hear the champagne bottles popping open in the background… and it was a written statement. permalink fedilink source parent [–] errer@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 child) This tells you all you need to know about how “punitive” this ruling was permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago To be fair anything short of selling chrome or breaking up the company would have a positive reaction. The possibility of losing chrome was priced in. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago I liked googles response statement that they disagree with the ruling and are considering their next steps. You could hear the champagne bottles popping open in the background… and it was a written statement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] errer@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 child) This tells you all you need to know about how “punitive” this ruling was permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago To be fair anything short of selling chrome or breaking up the company would have a positive reaction. The possibility of losing chrome was priced in. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago To be fair anything short of selling chrome or breaking up the company would have a positive reaction. The possibility of losing chrome was priced in. permalink fedilink source parent