1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 1 year ago

I'll believe it when I see it. There is so many of these articles the last few years which are basically China is going to do X in the next decade. Its funny how seriously these articles take Chinese proposals. Its the equivalent of a trump promise.

  • source
  • 28 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 73 points 1 year ago

    American century of humiliation continues unabated as we sell our parks to the highest bidder

  • source
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    China is working on embarrassing the US whenever they can. And in this case I very much approve of this specific case.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago

    ... china is looking better and better all the time :\

    here in the 'states, people always reflexively bark "but you can criticize the government here without being thrown in jail or executed" and yet that statement is becoming shakier and shakier by the DAY. The US government has detained and attempted to disappear legal residents for criticizing the regime, and It's starting to look terrifyingly possible that they'll soon do that to full-fledged CITIZENS TOO.

    Man. We are fucking cooked.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/china-national-parks-system

    It's a good read, parks bigger than Florida. Ambitious goals. I'd like to visit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    I've been to a few of them, they're pretty excellent. At least the ones I've been to had good signal and wifi throughout the park. Also a ton of staff to help.

    Edit: I guess I've been to the national parks that are not IUCN certified like some of the historic mountains. Still awesome parks.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That's... not a good thing. Not having a signal in national parks is one of the perks, it keeps the glampers away. I fully expect a park with WiFi to have Bluetooth speakers playing nonsense everywhere you go.

    This news still makes me fantasize about moving to China, though...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Having good wireless coverage (even cellular, let alone wi-fi) in national parks implies a level of development that such parks should not have. I mean, sure, they're not "wilderness" (in the US park taxonomy sense), but still...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Absolutely! Even something janky like dirt roads can be a helpful barrier to keep crowding down and nature preserved. I live in WA and the road to the famous Hoh rainforest recently washed out and it's actually a blessing. It'll take a few years to repair, giving the Hoh a much needed break.

    Tourists peel the moss off the trees!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I suppose you also have to be careful not to make your dirt roads too janky or else they become fun for the 4x4 folks and mountain bikers (and yes, I'm speaking for myself in both cases). It always sucks when a trail gets closed because too many users and/or inconsiderate users tore it up too much.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, and I have a great bridge to sell you

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/positive_news@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Somebody pull Rosevelt out of his grave. Time to teach trump what a REAL republican is supposed to look like, and open a shitload more national parks!

  • source