all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Explanation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Liberty_Place

While the notion that policing forces in the US grew out of slave patrols is widespread, it is not strictly speaking true - in the 1850s, many locales simply did not have formal policing forces, which was still a cutting-edge innovation from Britain (see: Peele's Principles ). In the post-Civil War era, Federal Reconstruction in the South led to an increasing need for abstract law enforcement which did not rely on mob consensus.

Sadly, the reversal of Reconstruction resulted in many of those newly-established law enforcement organizations in the South being taken over or subverted by the enduring racist majority; while in the North they took the more 'usual' route of being subverted by monied interests in politics. Later, US policing would become more insular and a political power in and of itself, which was... not really any better.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    many locales simply did not have formal policing forces, which was still a cutting-edge innovation from Britain

    A formal police force is not a British invention. It existed in other European countries (especially France) hundreds of years before the British. Peele's Principles doesn't really have anything to do with that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    January 1878, the police chief has gathered his force for an all hands meeting. It turns out that as of the new year, the police will be taking on a lot of new responsibilities as he hands out the new Racism Cards and informs everyone they will have to attend mandatory racial insensitivity training.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 5 comments in c/shermanposting@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] [S] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Explanation:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Liberty_Place

    While the notion that policing forces in the US grew out of slave patrols is widespread, it is not strictly speaking true - in the 1850s, many locales simply did not have formal policing forces, which was still a cutting-edge innovation from Britain (see: Peele's Principles ). In the post-Civil War era, Federal Reconstruction in the South led to an increasing need for abstract law enforcement which did not rely on mob consensus.

    Sadly, the reversal of Reconstruction resulted in many of those newly-established law enforcement organizations in the South being taken over or subverted by the enduring racist majority; while in the North they took the more 'usual' route of being subverted by monied interests in politics. Later, US policing would become more insular and a political power in and of itself, which was... not really any better.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Weren't most early police forces actually slave catchers?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 year ago

    As mentioned in the explanation:

    While the notion that policing forces in the US grew out of slave patrols is widespread, it is not strictly speaking true - in the 1850s, many locales simply did not have formal policing forces, which was still a cutting-edge innovation from Britain (see: Peele's Principles ). In the post-Civil War era, Federal Reconstruction in the South led to an increasing need for abstract law enforcement which did not rely on mob consensus.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago