I'm confused by this as well. The law is the take it down act. It does not make it illegal to generate images of famous people. It makes it illegal to post nude images of them without consent only if they request it taken down. So there's no reason here that the law should be limiting the ability to generate faces for personal use. Other platforms like civitai have also removed famous people. It doesn't make any sense, it's an extreme knee jerk reaction.
post
There's no law
replies:
Still trying to figure out why this new version can't recognise famous faces?..have just tried asking for Dolly Parton..it obviously knows who i'm on about as the outfit & hairstyle are exactly like hers (without any prompts from me btw)...but I keep on getting the same female face that keeps appearing on every person i'm trying to recreate,no matter how much facial detail I put in...is there some sort of fault with this new version?..or is there something blocking users from getting the results they want...How did the old version know how to create images of anyone famous (or even not that famous)..did it search the internet & come up with suggestions?...can't this new version do that?
all 9 comments