Most other search engines show https://www.southparkuncensored.com/ after searching for "south park uncensored" or "southparkuncensored", but Bing doesn't, and therefore DuckDuckGo and Qwant neither.

top 61 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

DDG is more of a privacy frontend for Bing then its own search engine. Typically if its not on Bing its not gonna be on DDG.

Works on both Brave and Google via Mullvad Leta

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Is it a surprise? Bing is controlled by M$, and their search results are taken by Qwant and DDG. Ecosia also runs with google results so it isn't affected.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Wait Ecosia switched from Bing to Google?

    Startpage was the only commercial search engine indexing Google from my knowledge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ecosia uses both but they do use the bing ads system

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (34 children)

    Damn shame. I use DDG, but them consistently fucking up makes me want to switch. Though i don't know of any alternatives.

    edit: thanks for the recommendations!

  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    SearXNG instances, bravesearch, startpage, etc...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Doesn't startpage use google, though? Wouldn't it still be affected?

    I will try searxng/brave, thank you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Yeah it is dependant on Google and Google can do censorship. However from personnal experience (maybe it differ in different countries) Google does less censorship than Microsoft at least regarding their search engines.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    https://leta.mullvad.net/ uses Brave or Google

    https://searx.space/ uses any of the big search engines you want, you do have to pick an instance

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Best one is probably (in my opinion) selfhosting a searxng instance. It takes results from a dozen of engines (you configure which ones) and merges them according to the configured weights and some algorithmic magic.

    If you use public instances, the owner might have tuned the results to suit themselves and it returns garbage for your usecase. And also they frequently get timeouts because a lot of people use them. So don't get turned off by trying a couple of them.

    Since I started running my own private instance I am super happy with the search results.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Kagi. Privacy focussed, no ads, and excellent results with options for sorting preferred sources to appear at the top, or not. Costs money but man, it’s fast and good in the way Google was back in the day. Some plans also include anonymous access to a variety of LLMs though they are older models, and if they can run them locally, they do. Really liking it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    FWIW the founder of Kagi is adamant that subscribers must accept part of the subscruption money being sent to Russia (Yandex, fully govt-controlled) and has refused all attempts at excluding it. When questions started appearing he even tried claiming Yandex isn't even russian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
  • [+] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Ngl I don’t get these people always being like “Source?”

    Just look it up bruh it takes less time than to comment

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Yea, it's gets to sounding like playground argument tactics "nuh uh!" (which is basically sophistry).

    Even when I'm being genuinely curious these days, I try to ask for a source by making it a convo, like "do you remember where you came across that or what should I search for to get good results", instead of "source?".

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I swapped to Kagi this month. It's refreshing. I'll probably end up on the $10/month plan. They also have a library pilot program I'm trying to get my academic library to look into.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Startpage is similarly anonymous, but it uses Google search

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And is owned by an ad company afaik

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Startpage's majority shareholder is System1 who is an adtech company. We don't believe that to be an issue as they have a distinctly separate privacy policy. The Privacy Guides team reached out to Startpage back in 2020 to clear up any concerns with System1's sizeable investment into the service, and we were satisfied with the answers we received.

    From privacyguides.org

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I guess you are supporting my assertion?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    I mean yeah, this is a screenshot of the search results. It is weird that there is a reddit post asking to see the opposite above the desired page which just needed the TLD added. But still, the page in question is in the search results.

    Not sure why I got a downvote, but I don't mind being unpopular.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    In context it felt like a rebuttal, but with the link clearly shown. Maybe a comment to help clarify next time?

    For the record, I deprioritize reddit so the actual link is on top for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is the problem with social media, especially Lemmy and Reddit. It is the default stance to assume a neutral comment is hostile. Why do we all argue so much? I've been there, but I'm trying to be kinder online. I think it's a systemic problem and I don't know the solution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I've noticed over the years it ebbs and flows with the broader "societal mood". People are much more on edge nowadays for rightful reasons, but it creates a pretty toxic environment on the internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Context is needed. What is that site? And why do you believe search results about it are being censored?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    To be honest, the poster is "SPU," so this is probably 90% to promote the site. (Not that I really care that much in this case, I like South Park and think episodes that have Muhammad in them should still be available despite religious extremists being upset.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    More like 97% addressing and countering censorship. Other than the remaining 3% that undeservedly strokes my ego I personally have nothing to gain by promoting the site in itself; no ads, no tracking, no donations.

    I was simply surprised and disgusted by search results being censored on DDG and Qwant and thought others would like to know this too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    AFAIK, Yandex doesn't censor piracy stuff.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    You people are annoying as fuck. Just stick with Google/Bing (USA, lol) or their surrogates (DDG, Qwant...) then, and keep complaining about not finding piracy-related results.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I haven't ever complained about not getting piracy results because I don't use search engines for that (there are some piracy indexes that work just as well)

    I may as well try Yandex for piracy, because USA has been as bad if not worse than Russia against Europe. This is basically choosing the lesser evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • Streisand Effect incoming.

  • source
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)