all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 36 points 1 year ago

They're not in denial. They're in active collusion.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Bought and paid for baby.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Imagine thinking CORPORATE news companies would not do everything in their capacity to protect their own profits... Corporations will never save us, they will only ever save themselves. They'll eject reality and carry water for the administration in order to keep the money coming in.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Generations?! Nah. When we Americans had 3 or 4 TV stations, it was a far different media landscape. Each was terrified of seeming biased, strove for neutrality. The driving factor for tuning into a given broadcast was trust in the news anchor. Not trust as in, "I agree.", trust as in, "I believe he's telling the truth and won't get called bullshitting." And they all basically reported the same news. Say what you will of that, but we were on the same page and neither the government nor the rich had much of a say.

    Journalists used to hunt politicians for sport. Check the comic Bloom County for what it was like in the 80s. After Watergate, it was "weapons free" on politicians, the more dirt, the better. But there better be meat on that bone! PROOF.

    It was funny and sad seeing Al Jazeera America try to take hold. Their mission statement was utterly unbiased reporting. And it was. And it was dry as paste. I have some journalism education, the American version was as unbiased as anything I've seen from American news since the 80s. After decades of "infotainment", I'm ashamed to say it was hard to read. They lasted one year.

    tl;dr: News bias is a relatively new thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    How is a thumbnail picture of BabyBel cheeses relevant?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Top newsrooms have been pumping out propaganda for as long as I can remember. Democracy now is still reporting reality

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Flagged and dead, naturally 😓

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago
    11 comments in c/world_news@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    They are active participants there is a difference

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Amazing what you can do by owning the press.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    As the article gives examples of, the (US-based not-for-profit) Associated Press is doing it too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That shows how controlled they are as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    We have become an authoritarian state, and our top newsrooms are complicit | Press Watch

    Ftfy

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Denial? No, they are complying.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    We're past the point where a change in their behavior could have made a difference.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    I thought this post was about the age checking requirement from the UK govt., but on reading it's the USA (I thought I saw instance was .ca)).

  • source