I imagine this will be disabled in the EU, but it's a concern nonetheless.

top 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I didn't understand why we didn't set the expectation years ago of phones ignoring the top and bottom 20%. Change it so 80 is the new 100, 20 is the new 0, and then play up the longevity factor and some marketing bs around "we squeeze every last drop out of the last 5%" (ie letting the phone go to 18% or something).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    We did. Your phone's battery controller already does that, and the percentage displayed to you is normalized to the available range.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Whatever the case I know that I'm very concerned about getting a pixel until they demonstrate several models that don't swell or spontaneously combust into flames. I mean, if they had to kill the 4A, the 6A, which bursts into flames, and the 7A, that makes me highly concerned.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If it's any consolation, my 4XL, 6 Pro and 8 Pro have all been fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Yeah my old 6a by the end of it had to be charged 2x a day. And it was less that 3 years old. My theory is they cheaped out on some component or the batteries themselves. The software just made it even worse for those of us who actually use the phone. But beats it exploding I guess.

    Still haven't received my money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I can get rid of this fucking phone and get one not made by Google.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    we are an American company so we will lie and steal and cheat. Get used to it

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    The fix is called Graphene OS.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There were news recently that there won't be grapheneos for newer models.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 16 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 34 points 1 year ago

    Actually, there is something you can do about it.

    But it doesn't involve Google.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Google says the Pixel 8a and newer Pixel phones can withstand 1,000 charging cycles before their batteries drop down to 80% effective capacity. However, this Battery Health Assistance feature essentially reduces the phone’s battery capacity over and above standard degradation.

    ...

    It’s also disappointing as some rival smartphone makers address battery health concerns by offering more durable batteries. For example, Samsung’s top phones can withstand 2,000 charging cycles before dropping down to 80% effective capacity, while OnePlus and OPPO’s lithium-ion batteries offer 1,600 cycles before reaching 80% capacity. So there likely wouldn’t be a need for a Battery Health Assistance tool if Google’s batteries had similar longevity.

    Sounds like they could just use better batteries but they're too cheap. It is Google after all, just a small company without much money to spend.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Companies that use child slavery and modern slavery in their batteries holding people hostage to their decisions on how your personal devices should operate...sounds about right.

    When will companies pay reparations to the affected populations for enabling their obscene profit?

    EDIT: And if phones are melting, Google replacing or fixing affected devices or providing refunds is appropriate, I feel.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    If only. My wife's phone is affected by a Google battery recall. You basically get $50 of shut-up money and get to live with a software update that nerfs your phone to an almost unusable state, or you can try and have a local, approved repair shop replace the faulty battery.

    We're living in a large city, there is exactly one approved store available. You can't contact them by email, no one has picked up the phone in weeks. She is close taking the $50.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I was planning on capping charge to 80%, which should address a lot of these issues without artificial slowing added later.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    So, like Apple did, but worse?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    did you read it? apple throttled device performance. google is throttling charging speed and battery capacity for safety reasons. there are literally phones melting. also, battery capacity is something people assume will go down over time. also they're giving clear notifications when people are affected.

    it's not really the same, and definitely not worse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Apple throttled (and continues to throttle) device performance because going full power draw on a battery with higher than specified internal resistance will just end in a device shutdown.

    They do this once there's a first unexplained shutdown. So that takes your actual battery health into account. In contrast, Google says "200 charges should be enough for anybody" and imposes its policy no matter what your actual battery looks like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    People keep raving about Pixels. All I see are overheating processors and now this bullshit

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    LOL. Guys, who is stupid enough yo buy anything from Google?

  • source