all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

The headline writer did not read the story. Protests are being called music festivals, not raids.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Yeah and if you go on tiktok and search la music festivals or music festivals, it just shows you people saying protest coverage is now labelled this, they're still censoring the actual footage of the protests. And they're censoring different things for different countries.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    US libs: "PEOPLE IN COMMUNIST CHINA ARE FORCED TO USE SLANG WHEN TALKING ABOUT CHINESE ATROCITIES TO GET PAST CENSORSHIP!!"

    Also US libs: "Unalive" "Music Festival" Bleeping out Palestine "This is fine and way better than communist China"

    Also interesting how Tiktok only started doing this after they were forcibly sold off from the Chinese parent company and was forced to conform to "Western values" eh?

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    People clearly realize that these algorithms are suppressing dissidents and freedom of speech. Why do they continue to subject themselves to these hacky workarounds and self-censorship?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] [S] 33 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    because there are no viable alternatives for large outreach.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Sounds like a job for the Fediverse...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    the fediverse is microscopic and the people you want to get involved politically probably stay away from it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The reality is that apps like TikTok, Twitter, Instagram, etc.. have marketing teams and entire institutions practically advocating for their use across the planet. In some parts of Asia and South America, you literally cannot get by without WhatsApp in more urbanized areas, for example.

    This is the result of US imperialism. They have just enough data centers and server capacity to run hundreds of Instagrams if they wanted to, unlike the Global South (excl. China).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    only influencers and advertisers need the large outreach; a huge majority of people just passively use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If you want your movement or important information to reach a bunch of people, you need to go to a platform that has a bunch of people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Idiots will do anything just so they dont have to learn how Email works.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    do you really expect to be CC'd along with hundreds or thousands of others about ICE raids, never mind about literally any event involving injustice? And how about footage of said event? Where's that going to be stored? As an attachment? Google Drive link?

    When censorship of one of its worst kind is unfolding in front of you, where genocide is referred to as "water slide", you instead blame the people for self-censoring? Get real.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago

    I don't use mastodon exactly because I don't want to put in the labor of figuring out what content to consume. I want to be in control of the logic, but the machine should be doing it. The fediverse fails because it thinks people who want control over their feed are fine with not putting in any labor at all, basically conceding to big platforms that the only way to customize a feed is in an exploitative, invasive way, which is obviously bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    5 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 78 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I like Tiktok for funny and helpful videos, but I deleted it because I realized the algorithm was controlling too much of what I was seeing. I realized it was starting to shape my opinions and split.

    Their algorithm is a drug and spreads propaganda just like Facebook. Stay far away.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I make a point of avoiding any form of mass produced short video format. I could almost feel my IQ dimming as I watched those things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago

    Good on you for making that realization. Most TikTok users I encounter do not have that level of self-reflection. I‘m not sure if I would have it if I ever installed it. I mean when you‘re constantly surrounded by the algorithmic equivalent of yes-men on TikTok, any opposition outside your bubble must look like a glitch. It seems pretty tough to break out of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • 3 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    How about not using a platform that supress information about dissent?

    This is super shady, how can people trust this app?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The platform choices of the general public tend to be like this. Whether the platforms becoming large leads to them being shady, or whether the results of them being shady is what draws people to them, I have no idea.

    Either way, a lot of people use TikTok, and there's no changing that, at least easily.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    In Tiktok's case, it has been shady for years.

    There were already reports Tiktok censoring dissent in 2019 when it started gaining popularity internatinally:

    And even before that, Tiktok's parent company always operated and had its headquarter in China, so it's forced to comply with the Great Firewall of China, and participate though their own moderation/algorithm.

    Relying on a media that operate (in part) in a totalitarian state with heavy handed censorship is foolish. Even if they have some infrastructure elsewhere, it's sowned by and answering to ByteDance management. Like all media companies from that country, it's under pressure from the local and/or central government.

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Hearing about the same thing for Portland too

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Users claim that videos about the protests in LA are getting “shadow banned,” or secretly censored by the TikTok algorithm, with TikTokers in other states saying they were unaware of the protests because the content hadn’t appeared on their feeds. TikTok declined to comment. According to its community guidelines, the platform makes content it deems “not suitable for a broad audience” harder to find in search and ineligible for the “For You Page.” Eligibility standards list hate speech, misinformation, dangerous activity and other subjects as prohibited. Protests are not listed as prohibited content. 

    Now creators have switched to code words, referring to protests as music festivals to help on-the-ground reports reach a wider audience. Though LA Public Press could not determine who first coined the term, by Wednesday, “Music Festivals 2025” and “LA Music Festival” were trending on the app. There are currently no major music festivals happening in LA right now.

  • source