1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 1 year ago

Good read. I like the data. I've sussed out critics I tend to align with and read what they have to say after watching a movie, but never before. If I want to be disappointed I look to see what RT scores it for comparison. Granted, RT is a relatively spoiler free way to at-a-glance see if something might be worth spending money on but clearly it's less and less reliable over the years. Reminds me of Yelp and their bullshit. In a perfect world we'd all make much more money to see many more movies and not feel the need to min-max all the fuckin time. Maybe that's just me.

  • source
  • 14 comments in c/movies@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 35 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    In a nutshell: 1) Fandango buys rotten tomatoes in 2016, 2) they expand/widen the critic reviewer pool to include nobody bloggers, and then 3) movie studios court/bribe small fish reviewers to inflate their scores so they can get the fresh rating as a marketing point for their latest flick.

    Nice to finally have this all spelled out. I've been burned several times over the last few years watching movies with like 79% ratings on RT that I thought sucked. Now I know why.

    What's the alternative? IMDB is owned by Amazon and has a super dumb recency bias. I use Letterboxd and that might be the best at the moment. But the user base there is smaller and sometimes it feels like the only people reviewing movies are the select few who went out of their way to watch it so they are inherently skewed to like it.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    This is why I don't go to aggregate sites like this for reviews. I only ever listen to opinions from youtubers I've found online who have similar likes and dislikes as myself. Now I've got a tight cluster of people who can help me get a good gage on if I'll like something or not. It isn't perfect, but it works.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    If you’re just looking for a number that tells you if the movie is worth watching, I bet Letterboxd is a good source. I don’t write reviews, but I’ll add a rating for every movie I watch. Partly because that’s the easiest way to tract my movies. I bet many do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    There is still the audience score and the top critics score. This will need to be looked at specifically but shouldn't have the same issues as the overall ranking. If that section is useless except for marketing just ignore it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I don't use it to find good movies, but I will filter out bad movies with it. I only consider the value when it is low.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago
    [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    "After five days of "Certified Fresh" movie propaganda, I began to grow suspicious. If every movie is un-rotten, then one of two things must be true:

    Humanity Has Stopped Producing Bad Art

    Rotten Tomatoes Has Changed"

    1. Only "Fresh" movies advertise their rating.
  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I never found them to be reliable indicators of whether or not I will enjoy a movie. Not ever.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Is TMDB the best alternative out there?

    Are there any fediverse alternatives?

  • source
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Because Lemmy.world is a major instance. Never heard of piefed before today

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 9 comments in c/movies@piefed.social view that post
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Tl;dr: not reliable.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    It never was...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Thank you for sharing

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Something rotten about them...

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    We still care about what critics have to say? When it comes to art, you like what you like. Who cares about what others think

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments