all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Those who are disfavored by authoritarian governments may lose access not just to pornography, but to social media and all of these other services.

Nothing anyone can say will ever convince me that this is not the true purpose behind these laws

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Oh no! A contractor cut corners and 90 year olds dismt get the government policy right?! Quelle suprise!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Eh, let's not be ageist about this. Ignorant and corrupt legislation isn't caused by the elderly, it's caused by ignorance and corruption, which are not exclusive traits of elderly people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    For sure, but you'll note that the average age of Congress people is about 58 in the House and 64 in the Senate. It's not exactly correlation without causation - right now I see a lot of people that are solidly above 60 there that I wouldn't trust not to steal change from a donation bucket for orphans.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Hm. Fair enough. I’ll confess to being one of those “just use zero knowledge proofs and move on” folks. But those are pretty good points.

    Maybe in a future world where the verifier system can, itself, be verified without compromising any data…?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 4 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm not very convinced by this article. A lot of the "realities" are not, they're policy choices. Just as an example, the notion of the non-driving elderly adult having to be taken by their child to some office to get an ID is just a consequence of the US choosing not to have compulsory and free or nominal charge ID for all residents. Most of the other objections are equally dependent on specific policy choices, which may apply in some places and not others.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    It's absolutely possible to have privacy-preserving age verification, but it requires government to trust someone else than themselves, which they'll never do.

    Go to gas station. Hand cashier your ID, like you do to buy liquor. Cashier gives you a one time use token/password to the age verification system website. You go there and upload a public key you generate before the OTP expires. Voila: now the site could easily verify that you control the private key and (trusting) that consequently you are of age, without having to know literally anything about you.

    It only breaks if you treat everyone as a criminal until proven innocent (e.g. "you might have stolen that key", etc), which is exactly what every government implementing this is doing, which is why it's not really about protecting kids from porn at all but about removing privacy.

  • source
  • In other news, virginity-preserving sex falls apart on contact with reality.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    My question is that, because I don't believe it will stop, what should be our next steps? What software should we get now that can circumvent or make as much of this a nonissue as possible?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • tor browser + a good vpn (mullvad is solid) should be your baseline, but also look into virtualization/sandboxing tools like Qubes OS if your really concerned about tracking. its an arms race tho, so staying informed on privacy forums is crucial.

  • source
  • parent
  • 3 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Of course. It's impossible to implement a discrimination system without knowing who you're discriminating against

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    it's also impossible to have authentic online social interactions, voting, banking, watching porn, shopping

    maybe you don't realise you've been doing it already? look up countries like estonia to see how beneficial online identities are

    or you could stay in your dystopian fantasy larp, which, like this article, is where you belong

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 3 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    this is a paper for the w3c explaining why, not an actual corporate platform that disintegrated upon launch

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I don't get it. Zero knowledge proofs do work.

    So the problem is that we need to fix the regulations first.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post

    Great article! Thanks! Couldn’t agree more that the age verification moves (Zero-knowledge or not) are bad news for everyone’s privacy. It is certainly a tool for constructing infrastructure to control the internet beyond “protecting children”.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post