all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 1 year ago
[–] 13 points 1 year ago
[–] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Does it mean they will be self hosting it?

Does it alsoean to write a bug report or a fix, I red a new account?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Forgejo supports SSO, and from a quick skim of the diff it looks like they support GitHub and OpenID logins.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Still way more annoying than Github. Still, they apparently are moving from an existing mailing list / git send-email "solution", so it is at least a huge step in the right direction.

    If they're philosophically against Github I don't know why they didn't just move to Codeberg though. Maybe that's too modern for people who have only just moved on from mailing lists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Codeberg is just hosted forgejo why are you discouraging self-hosting? Using codeberg has nothing to do with modern they use the same server software.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Because if you already have a Codeberg account you don't need to create another account to contribute.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago

    Delighted to hear this! I’m working towards purging as many applications as I can that are hosted on GitHub and ffmpeg is one I use regularly.

  • source