“We dOn’t hAvE ThE ReSoUrCeS To fEeD AnD HoUsE EvErYoNe!!1”
post
replies:
I wanted to show real time rendered graphics in the same interval, but there were no real time graphics in 1959.
Still, these two are 33 years apart, so we can do half.
New technologies tend to explode very quickly while there is obvious iteration and improvement from a new principle left on the table and then they settle down as the room for improvement shrinks.
replies:
What will come next in 2035? ... at the rate we're going, probably something stupid like femboy hitler
replies:
66 years is a long time. Considering that 1969 was 56 years ago, we still have 10 years to do something similarly worthwhile.
... 10 years is also a long time. It can wait until tomorrow.
replies:
[removed by mod]
replies:
No wonder it took that plane 66 years to fly to the moon. It looks really slow.
Amazing how photography technology improved.
Hard to believe that man landed on the moon only 60+ years after landing on Earth. Makes you wonder what's next
replies:
And only 12 years later....
replies:
[deleted]
replies:
We're still ignoring the history of all flight and rocketry prior to the invention of the heavier than air aircraft, I see.
replies:
replies:
Photography advanced by a lot in that time.
Time to make another deal with aliens to the next big jump
Pretty sure people invented flags long time ago.
/j
If it's true that these two photographs are only separated by 66 years, does that mean that NASA faked the moon landing on the beach at Kitty Hawk?
And you wonder why people think there was a conspiracy.
replies:
view more:
next ›
top 89 comments