top 89 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 80 points 1 year ago (1 child)

He should never get his license back. What the hell. Only 6 months.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Unfortunately, traveling by car is seen as the default. Hence using something else than a car to travel is seen as taking unnecessary risks, which is why we see a lot of victim blaming.

    Speed limit inside of cities should be like 30km/h, 20km/h during the times of day when school typically starts and ends, all day near a school. Fines for speeding should be 3 dayfines for each kilometer you're over the limit, with five percent of your net worth being added to your annual income for the calculation. 5 dayfines if you speed in a school zone. And if somebody throws themselves in front of your car, and they die, you should lose your license for 6 months. (Though in this case, all financial damages emerging from your license suspension should be paid by the estate of the deceased). In case of vehicular manslaughter that doesn't involve somebody deliberately hitting your car, the license should be suspended permanently.

    Sorry for the rant.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 146 points 1 year ago (29 children)

    misdemeanor? so like, murder is illegal, murdering multiple with a truck is kind of legal

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Meanwhile a couple of parents in North Carolina are facing manslaughter charges after they let their kids walk to the grocery store while they guided them over the phone and one of them got hit and killed by a car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I sure hope so, the kid basically ran into traffic. No crosswalk, completely unsupervised.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Yeah I agree it's fucked up that the parents are in trouble and the driver isn't. The article says the driver is 76... The father probably was jailed mostly for having the wrong skin color.

    I walked to school more blocks than that at a younger age. The article says the state doesn't have laws that specify what age the kids must be supervised at to leave their own home. This happened mere blocks from where they lived.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It is equal in legality as throwing one sub at an ICE agent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    So, if you actually read the article, it says he claimed that the steering wheel locked up on him, but the NTSB stated that he suffered from severe fatigue. Maricopa county prosecutors said there wasn't enough evidence to press any felonious charges.

    So, at best, this would be a case of manslaughter (which is a felony), but there's no conclusivity on whether it was with malicious intent or premeditated.

    So no, he's not a murderer. He negligently fell asleep at the wheel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    If u drive while being impaired (by whatever) ur a piece of shit and if u kill anyone doing that (except like suffering a heart attack or something not foreseeable) ur a murderer in my mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • As someone who is a master of operating under what should be severe impairment I agree, being awake for 48 just leaves me vaguely slow when I talk. Also folks need to know their fucking limits, I refused to drive while I had food poisoning because I couldn't think and also I didn't want to shit myself in my car.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Fortunately, the law doesn't operate on what's in your mind.

    Murder implies premeditation. The prosecutor and judge didn't see evidence of premeditation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    A lot of people use the word "murder" in a colloquial sense and not a strictly legal one. Further some jurisdictions have degrees of murder where other jurisdictions would use manslaughter. I'm assuming the person you responded to meant the lesser charges.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    There is no law and order in the US. If you want to diddle kids, just operate a Joint commission accredited troubled teen facility. There are literally zero requirements, and you can sue anyone who questions you into poverty!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It doesn't seem to have been done intentionally, so at best it's involuntary manslaughter. They think he may have fallen asleep or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Okay so negligent manslaughter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    It meets the exact spirt of involuntary manslaughter. Where his negligence either through faulty vehicle maintenance like him claiming that his steering wheel locked up or by being too tired and driving a multi ton vehicle that caused the deaths of multiple people. And yet they dropped some bullshit ass charges instead

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I mean it is not, by any legal definition of the word, murder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Insane. My friend is serving 6 months because he fought back against his violent abusive dad one time. This guy gets 6-12 months after killing 2 and injuring 11? Wtf is this system?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Remember people, if you wanna kill someone, make sure you're in a car! If you're lucky you might not even get a jail sentence!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    It's ok, none of the people killed or hurt were billionaires, so like.. they guy barely broke any real laws worth worrying about.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    I'd like to know whether that means he can drive for the 2nd hald of his prison term.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    for international context here: this is (one of) the hottest major city in the country world; we have year round bike weather. This happens all the time unfortunately.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The hottest city != Bike weather?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    People who live here are used to the heat. I ride my bike in >40° weather all the time. People who aren’t used to the heat yet will start to ride right before sunrise when it’s 27-30°. To give you another frame of reference: I set my HVAC to 25.5° year round and turn it down to 24.5° when I’m “overheated” (room temp <24° is unbearably cold to me). We’re just built different here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is good. It gives the grieving families a year to plan how to get the bastard once he’s out of jail.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (17 children)
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    So, upon reading the article, the NTSB concluded the driver was extremely fatigued.

    Do truck drivers not get tired where your from? Is this incident really an indictment of the entire United States? Is the rest of the world a tragedy-free paradise?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    If you drive while tired and kill someone as a result that's not an accident. You intentionally kept driving instead of pulling over and taking a nap.

    There is effectively no difference in drunk driving and driving while extremely tired. Both impair your driving ability equally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    IMO driving while tired is worse as the impairment creeps up on you for hours and you can stop at any time. There should be almost no impairment in your decision making.

    On drugs it conceivable that you took a couple of shots and then your drunken mind decided to drive. In this case the decision to drive was made by someone impaired.

    If you drive in a professional capacity your employer should be held accountable too. People that drive their employees to drive unsave should lose their business and spend some time in jail.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    I largely agree, but the Maricopa prosecutor and judge saw it differently.

    Edit: Downvotes don't change reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Doesn't mean much. Police violence cases are regularly ignored by prosecutors and judges due to lack of public interest/insufficient evidence you didn't deserve to be battered.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Never had to report to a boss, eh?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    i don’t care enough about your boss to ignore 2 people dying

    it should be negligent homicide unless mechanical failure can be proven and even then he should have to show proper upkeep

    cars are 1000 pound+ death machines if people don’t respect the responsibility they should face more then this dude is getting

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm not ignoring their deaths. Send him to jail for a year, sure. But it won't fix the problem and it will allow him to experience life inside prison. I don't think they teach vehicle maintenance in there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    No, because we have mandatory breaks and such. Every second gets fully recorded and stored for authorities to check. Driving without sleep just isn't worth the risk of losing your license

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So does the United States in their trucking industry. This guy just fucked up horribly. He is not, however, a murderer which implies premeditation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Driving drunk is also premeditated. As should lack of sleep be

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    “Premeditated” in the context of homicide means someone intended to kill someone else. That is, they set into motion a course of actions because they believed that course of action would result in the death of a person.

    Homicide in the context of fatigue or impairment are not usually premeditated because people generally do not put themselves in those cognitive states believing that doing so will result in the death of someone else.

    Historically judicial systems have recognized that those cognitive states are more likely to result in unintentional deaths so do hold people operating vehicles under those conditions to a higher standard of punishment than, say, a sober person involved in a fatal crash. At the same time they consider intent and hold people in those circumstances to a lower standard of punishment than those who actually intended to kill someone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    It's really cool how judges would say that all human lives are equal but also closely match them to their net worth...

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    After those six months, we need you back out on those streets running over cyclists and subsidizing our dying domestic auto industry, you hear me?!

    • Judge in this case after doing his sentencing

    /s

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I imagine he'll face the consequences for the rest of his life, regardless of how the "justice" system handles it. Honestly, I'd be surprised if he lived 10 years before something happened to him. The victims had families.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I would be extremely surprised if anything happened to him. It's not a movie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    At the very least there are 13 big civil suits coming his way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Those still have to go through jury? What happens if he cannot afford a lawyer?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Then he will have one appointed for him. It's kinda the reason that public defenders exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    But that is for criminal cases as far as I know. You will not get a public defender for civil case as far as I know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Prosecutor needs to be tried for treason. At the very least there needs to be a permanent license suspension.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    You plow a vehicle into an event and kill people - intent or no - you're definitely an enemy of that society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    Interesting hypothesis. I'd love to peruse an executive summary of your research methodologies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    It's short for bananas banana republic. As in the law is fucked up, or it isn't followed. USA has become a banana republic.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic

    I just though I'd shorthand it, because there are so many news stories that show this, that it's exhausting to respond to them individually.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Arizona is part of USA, and 1 year for killing 2 people due to gross irresponsibility.
    The laws are not designed for justice, but to benefit the rich.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Just because it doesn't sate your lust for vengeance?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    42 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post