all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Same with Ruby at this point. Someone needs to create a new RubyGems without all the c. 2009 abandonware shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    …and Python, Java, and GoLang.

    At least with Java, many of the cornerstone packages have a corporate sponsor maintaining them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    It's great when you find the perfect package but then see the last update was four years ago.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    I mean, it was built to help put JavaScript where it doesn't belong, so expectations of elegance and cleanness should be limited.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Isn't the usual approach to just include every single one of them anyway?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The sad part is that so few npm packages are really necessary…

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment