all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 1 year ago

MF, it's been a crisis but along with climate change involves "too much" cost for companies to back away from

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    It’s like the boy who called “wolf” but there’s a huge wolf and there’s always been a wolf.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Whenever I see something like this, I can only imagine an utopia free of capitalistic agendas that is humanity first.

  • source
  • 18 comments in c/health@lemmy.world view that post
    [+] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    social security queens

    May I ask who you mean by that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (15 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Lol. You guys make me laugh.

    "I make 50k and social security takes 3k!"

    No, dipshit, you make 47k. You just think they're taking the money from you because it's structured in a way to make you annoyed by it. Your company doesn't NEED to show you how much they pay into SS on your behalf. But they do because then you'll hate SS recipients and vote against your best interests.

    You've been played.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Learn basic economics

    Shit.. I thought I did. I better demand a refund from NYU. I'll also let my employer know twenty years in finance is worthless and I should be fired.

    SS doesn't need to have a fund. It doesn't need to be solvent. Someone decided to structure it that way for political reasons. Think outside the box a bit and you'll realize that the entire problem is manufactured.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    You're still laboring under the assumption that social security money is somehow different than the rest of the money. It's all just money. At the end of the day. We can always print more and give it to people.

    Now that's a bad idea because printing money is a flat tax, so all we really need to do is tax the rich and give that to people and not need social security.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    You complained about the people ON social security. But they have nothing to do with what you said. Your problem is the people who RUN social security.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You're a big fan of putting words in my mouth. If you keep this up I'm going to make you buy me dinner first. You dirty whore (I'm also assuming you have a negging kink because you keep insulting me).

    The two-party system has nothing to do with boomers. It is a natural consequence of first past the post electoral systems. Those systems were put in place when the country was founded. If you have a problem with that, take it up with some dead folks from the 1700s. Or take it up with literally every generation since then, including us, for not changing it.

    And it still seems that your problem is with the social security system itself. You just want to blame a specific group of people because it makes you feel good.

    But if anything, the blame could be put on Reagan since he's the one who started borrowing against SS, breaking the entire model and setting it up as fake political drama.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • 9 comments in c/science@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    and hits health at every stage from extraction to disposal

    I know this part is likely referring to the plastic itself, but due to the headline summary, it sounds like a super industrial, dystopic way of describing human birth and death.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Wondering the negative effects will be as bad as leaded gasoline?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    if they were that bad we'd know by now.

    edit: if you are downvoting you either don't know or have forgotten how obviously bad leaded gasoline was, even with 50 year old science.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetraethyllead#Toxicity

    The hazards of TEL content are heightened due to the compound's volatility and high lipophilicity, enabling it to easily cross the blood–brain barrier.

    Chronic exposure to TEL can cause long-term negative effects such as memory loss, delayed reflexes, neurological problems, insomnia, tremors, psychosis, loss of attention, and an overall decrease in IQ and cognitive function.[101]

    Concerns over the toxicity of lead[103] eventually led to the ban on TEL in automobile gasoline in many countries. Some neurologists have speculated that the lead phaseout may have caused average IQ levels to rise by several points in the US (by reducing cumulative brain damage throughout the population, especially in the young). For the entire US population, during and after the TEL phaseout, the mean blood lead level dropped from 16 μg/dL in 1976 to only 3 μg/dL in 1991.[104] The U.S. Centers of Disease control previously labelled children with 10 μg/dL or more as having a "blood lead level of concern". In 2021, the level was lowered in accordance with the average lead level in the U.S. decreasing to 3.5 μg/dL or more as having a "blood lead level of concern".[105][106]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Agreed. This is hardly a new problem.

    Plastics cause much harm to our ecosystems but I'm not sure microplastics are so bad. Plastic is a really broad term, makes it hard to talk about and I'm ignorant on much of the subject. But I understand that most microplastics are biologically inert?

    Seems like everyone on lemmy jumps to the conclusion that microplastics are or will have drastic health effects. No, they're not comparable to lead or asbestos, or, as you said, we'd know, would already have a mountain of evidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Absolutely disgusting:

    Being surrounded and yelled at about “misrepresenting reality” is not how serious United Nations-hosted negotiations are meant to proceed. But that is what happened to Prof Bethanie Carney Almroth during talks about a global treaty to slash plastic pollution in Ottawa, Canada. The employees of a large US chemicals company “formed a ring” around her, she says.

    At another event in Ottawa, Carney Almroth was “harassed and intimidated” by a plastic packaging representative, who barged into the room and shouted that she was fearmongering and pushing misinformation. That meeting was an official event organised by the UN. “So I filed the harassment reports with the UN,” said Carney Almroth. “The guy had to apologise, and then he left the meeting. He was at the next meeting.”

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Oh well, add it to the pile.

    We're all forty plus years into the great atomization project and we no longer have any ability to tackle even minor systemic issues. There's no way in our current state we're removing plastic from even newly manufactured items.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    The actual solution to the Fermi Paradox, artifical polymerization.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Will we extinct from plastic or not ? What is the chance we passed the point of no return ?

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/worldnews@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Less than 10% of plastic is recycled.

    Less than 10% is recycled and nobody wants to recycle it anyway, because it is difficult to recycle and the resulting recycled plastic is worse.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    and is set to almost triple again

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/world view that post
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    instead of a band of rust, our mark in the fossil record will be a layer of plastistone - plastics fused right into the rock.

  • source