top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 66 points 1 year ago* (10 children)

Why would one need to save up vacation days to take a "full paycheck" off? That is one month, so 20 working days? 20 working days should be very common mount of available vacation days per year (at least in EU)?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    20 working days should be very common mount of available vacation days per year (at least in EU)

    Americans:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I probably shouldn’t mention that 20 days is the legal minimum for full-time employment, and that 30 days is the typical amount most people receive. And there are extra days for getting promoted or working 10+ years...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I moved from my homeland to another EU country. When applying for a job through an agency, they asked me if 27 days of vacation is enough for me, cause typically everyone have 30 or more days in this country. I looked at her, smiled and said "Yes, that is enough". Little did she knew that back in my town I had maximum of 20 working days vacation + by the contract I was not able to take out more than 10 days in a row.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's pretty shitty PTO policy you've worked under.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I haven't had that little vacation or PTO with 9 employers over about the same time. Except for my first few years.

    Current company does PTO so I negotiated 6 weeks (effectively sick and vacation) plus the 8 holiday days they recognize.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I'm on a three week break and that's like normal summer holiday for most of us in France. I'd even say on the small side because we can't really be away that much from our respective jobs. The main difference is what one can afford to do during those three weeks, for sure, but otherwise we are paid the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Oh I was assuming a 2 week pay period so 10 days and still not all that surprised that someone would get that. Someone working part time more than likely won't get get any vacation nor sick time at all in America.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 57 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Took you 4 years to decide to fucking read your contract?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Lol, it'd be nice if they gave you one to read, but that's generally not the case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I read mine. My boss sent it to me 2 days before I actually started working there, then he let me work there for a week before actually signing, with all benefits being contractually valid from the day I started, not from the day I signed.

    If you never saw your contract, get a lawyer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    What do you sign when you start your job?

    Honestly never heard of no contract, what country is this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    My position is a state position in Europe. Since the specifics of the contract are standardized, and can be found online (theoretically), I didn’t have to sign a contract to start working. I hated it… still do, even if the job is overall good. I only have a piece of paper from HR stating that the state granted me the position.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    In Brazil you have a month of paid vacation for each worked year and you can't work for more that 2 years without using your vacation time. HR would force you to take your vacation time even if you don't want.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago*

    Know your contract. So many people get burned by what they thought they could do, or what they thought their employer couldn’t do, because they don’t know the rules of their employment. General rule of thumb: if it’s not spelled out in the contract that an employee can do a thing, the employee can’t do it. If it’s not spelled out somewhere that an employer can’t do it, you bet your ass they’re gonna try to do it.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (22 children)

    Where dafuq it stacks? AFAIK in most of the world it is either paid out in the end of the year or is wasted and goes nowhere.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    In Austria, vacation days expire two years after the end of the vacation year in which they were created. So you can save up vacation days, but not all of them for four years. You can do things like: go on only two weeks of vacation in year 1, then eight weeks in year 2.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Are y'all getting 5 weeks of vacation a year? My American mind cannot comprehend this.

    I've been at my company for almost a decade and I think I'm a bit over 4 weeks of vacation, a good chunk of that is due to seniority.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yes, legally required for all employees. 6 weeks for employees who have been working at the current company for a very long time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's marvelous.

    Is "very" long on the scale of like a decade or multiple decades?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    Employed in the US, I can stack up to 240 hours. After that it's use it or lose it, so I just take a few hours off every week.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    hours

    the US labor rights are so bad they have to measure time off in hours 😭

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    To be fair, 240 hours divided by an 8 hour work day is 30 days. That's pretty good amount of time that can roll over. Where I live it isn't measured in hours but there is less time that can roll over than 30 days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Genuine ignorance and curiosity - do y'all only do days? If you have to take half a day off, do you round up or down? And so I can have some context for your answer what country are you from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Hungary here. Can't remember the exact wording of the law, but most employers only give out full days. Employers have a lot of control over when paid time off can be taken, as long as the legally mandated requirement (at least 20 days plus other conditions every year) is met.

    My previous job, where I did rotating night shifts, counted the days that coincided with the start of the shift: if I had a paid day off on a Tuesday on a night shift week, I'd work from Monday 22:00 to Tuesday 6:00, stay at home on Tuesday, and start my next shift on Wednesday at 22:00 (just a hypothetical, I always tried to take full weeks).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The hours makes sense for a lot of companies that have shift work, because different employees have differing amounts of hours in their workday. Plus, my old place of work would let you use a few hours at a time, so if you wanted you could have off every friday afternoon.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    United States Postal Service, 440 hours (55 days) max accumulation of annual, temporarily increased to 520 hours/65 days since the pandemic, and unlimited sick leave rollover. Accumulated at a rate of 13 annual days and 13 sick days per year once you’re a career employee, and 20/13 after 3 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    In Czechia (not sure if by law) you can take half of your days off to thr next year. So, if you had 20 days off a year, you have to use 10 (HAVE to, they don't just fizzle out) you can stack 10 to the next year, so you can have up to 30 a year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    This doesn't apply in Australia. It accumulates (as does sick leave and long service leave) and if you don't use it you will start to be asked to start taking it after a couple years.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    as a heads up, if you can save enough money to take a sabbatical, you should. It was the greatest time of my fuckin' life.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    I'd love to but all the logistics are overwhelming for me. What made your sabbatical so good? Was it easy to finance?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    Was it easy to finance?

    I mean... yes and no? I earned about £35k+ per annum between between 2013 ish and 2017 ish, and didn't spend much money on hobbies and such and being frugal. So I was saving money without trying that hard, and figured that about £16k was enough to take a year out to try to learn spanish and slightly change careers, if I spent about £1k a month.

    What made your sabbatical so good?

    The complete freedom, living on my own, being able to work on daily and long term goals. I lived in a town that was near london, so it was (kinda) cheaper, walkable, 1 h away from london so I could visit from time to time, and had a climbing center nearby.

    I took the time to get regular exercise, work on my mental health, learn spanish and just live at my own pace. I even travelled a little (I had a holiday I booked in 2017 for 2018 that I was going on anyway to visit LATAM, and Behold The Arctopus was playing live gigs again for the first time in 5 years, and obviously they were not coming to europe, so I went to NY for like 5ish days (3 days + 1 night + 1 morning). [EDIT : I also returned to my country of origin for a month to save money/drop off sentimental value things/visit family, and en route away from europe I visited Denmark to be with a friend for a week for the last time in ages]

    I’d love to but all the logistics are overwhelming for me.

    What logicistics are causing you issues? I stayed in the same place I was in while I was working, and all I had to do was quit my job. There's not much to do... oh. You must be from the US? Healthcare? Good luck with that shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I have questions. How were you able to live for a year on 16K? Even if we disregard healthcare, that wouldn't even cover my mortgage. Let alone food, or especially travel and fun. You Were able to afford a phone? Utilities? Did you have any extras, like streaming services? I'm guessing you have the luxury of public transportation, so I can understand no car payments or gas and maintenance costs.

    Granted, I do live in the US. But I can't imagine everything is that much more expensive here. £16K is like, $20K right now, I'd live for maybe 2 months on that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Let's see...

    16k is about 1,300 a month. I paid about 700 for rent, and 2018 was before the current inflation wave, so 1,698.95 in today's pound sterling, leaving me with about 600 a month

    I was on calorie restrictions as part of my "get/stay in shape" , and usually ate pasta, rice, eggs and protein powder, with vegetables whenever , small amounts of cheese and condiments/hot sauce. My usual goal for food budget was £10 a day.

    Other expenditures were internet, electric, water and climbing gym membership. That's it. I think I was buying CBD vapes at the time for my anxiety as well, but that was a more occasional expense. I can't remember how much those things were, maybe 40 for internet? I can't remember my mobile phone plan.

    No car, no subscriptions, or other recurring costs. NHS for healthcare.

    $20K right now, I’d live for maybe 2 months on that.

    You spend 10k a month?? I currently earn somewhere between 4-5K dollars , what do you spend that money on?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I was thinking wrong. I was going off my salary rather than my take home. After taxes, health insurance, and retirement, it's about $6k.

    $1360 for my mortgage, which is really quite good as it's only 3.25%. Im pretty stuck in my house with current interest rates. $516 for one of my cars. $343 for one of my watches. About $300-400 for electricity in the summer, $80 for natural gas. $368 for car insurance. $168 for phones. $87 for internet. And $309 on a loan for some renovations. $30 planned parenthood donation. Typically about $40/week for gas.

    Amazon prime, Disney+, Spotify, Netflix, Paramount+. Idk what else. I guess the rest is just groceries, eating out, and hobbies.

    That's just the stuff I pay from my income, my wife and I never got joint bank accounts. She takes home about 3k, and she pays for our other car, which is $327, her student loan, which is $300, and childcare which is $295/week. Plus she puts money in the savings account.

    This discussion is making me think about the number of subscriptions I have, and the amount of expendable income I waste.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    This discussion is making me think about the number of subscriptions I have, and the amount of expendable income I waste.

    yeah, I have no idea why you're spending 343 on a watch every month. Also, this just re-validates my perspective that a car would just ruin me financially, and would have done so my entire life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Well, I could have just bought it. But it's a 0% interest loan. Same thing I did with my other two luxury watches, and it's almost done. Having a two year commitment to it definitely keeps me from looking at any more! I really like watches. It's probably my last one for a long time, anyway. Kids are expensive. $8600 for a watch over two years is cheap compared to $15k a year just in childcare. That's just one kid.

    You can have a car for a lot less, but we have relatively new cars and I opted for a lot of insurance for my own peace of mind. If we had any public transit options, we could get by with one car for sure. But there is nothing here. There is a city bus system that primarily caters to the low income, which is a great start. But it really only goes to like, the grocery stores and the urgent cares. Nowhere near our daycare, and definitely way short of the 30 miles to my office. We also have a shuttle bus that you can call for, that's only $3 a ride, but thats really just for the disabled and elderly. I'd say we have better transit than a lot of metropolitan cities I've been to, but obviously our society is completely car-centric.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Weird thing to wonder about how he can get by with 16k when you obviously have an insanely unnecessary consumption ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    "with my other two luxury watches" rofl

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I mean, I am aware of that. But 16k wouldn't even cover my mortgage, let alone food and utilities. Adding up just the essentials, housing + food + electricity + natural gas + phone + water, I'm at 27k. Being in the US, I'd say car and health insurance are also necessities. So, you can easily add another 5k or 6k to that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    If we keep the currencies the same, I know you mentioned earlier that £16k is about $20k, so we're looking at about $7k difference over a year (I understand that car and health insurance are necessities, but that doesn't work in this comparison because OP doesn't have either so it shouldn't be included)

    That's less than $600 a month difference -- and one thing I can immediately point to is your electricity bill. It sounds like you have a family, whereas it seems like OP lived alone for that year. Speaking from experience (currently living alone also in London) my electricity bill is $67 a month, and my natural gas is $33. That's $100, versus about $430 in your estimation (so we're now missing $270).

    I spend a fiver for my SIM card each month and have a cheap phone I paid like $100 for three years ago, so my phone plan is $6.75 vs your $168, which may be for multiple people as you said phones plural, so we've found another $161, bringing us down to $109 difference.

    My water bill is $50, I don't see yours but I am going to guesstimate at a three person household being maybe $80? Either way, I think the difference here is likely to be made by groceries and toiletries, because you've got a family!

    My groceries/toiletries budget is around $470 a month. I could absolutely lower that to around $300 but work is killing me at the moment and I just need to spend more to make my life easier in the evenings.

    So, looking at a monthly groceries/toiletries budget (combined) - is yours at least $570?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Someone talked about how his company was willing to give someone a six month sabbatical to keep this other dude around but the guy didn't take it. I was like that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard, just take it and then leave when it's over or whatever. And the person telling me this explained how he wasn't like that and wouldn't take advantage of the company. It just felt really weird. I don't experience true jealousy often but this was one of the times I have. Companies have never treated me well like that. The idea that people would just act like a 6 month sabbatical is something normal is fucking insane. I even told him that's crazy and I heard of and he said no, it's something a lot of places do. It's such an insanely privileged take to talk about it so casually.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Just to put it into perspective, the sabbatical isn't meant to be frequent and usually you're not meant to be paid, just have a job to go back to after. If it's available, it's somewhere where you're quite senior and been working there for a long time.

    For my sabbatical, I just straight up quit; I wasn't even playing to stay in the same country after it was over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 62 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    They didn't notice getting paid out for all of their vacation days?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 121 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    I'm guessing it was USA and they were just lost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    They just get lost in the UK too, most places seem pretty good about making sure you take them though.

    At the first full time job I had in Oz there were a bunch of old dudes who had each accrued over a year in untaken annual leave. The company had to crack down on it and make them start taking it because it was a huge liability, both financially and as a risk to actually getting work done. They had to develop plans for them to take it a couple months at a time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Gosh, I'm quite shocked at the UK. They are not ally pretty good for workers rights.

    The worker in Australia may have accrued long service leave. It's a seperate entitlement that means younger 3 months leave at once,.on top of holiday entitlement, after working somewhere for 10 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Older contracts and union deals can be quite good in the UK. I would bet if this company doesn’t have a union that newer employees would be limited in the number of days they can transfer to the next year, likely less than a week.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    No no, this was multiple old guys and in addition to long service leave, they just never took leave.

    For the UK I think the policy is in support of worker rights, in a round about kind of way. If you let people pay it out then they might never take leave and won't get the benefits of actually having had a break from work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Won't mine don't. If you still have days they either make you take them or they pay them out, about 3 years ago I had about a week due and it was around Christmas I wanted to take the week before Christmas off but it wasn't an option and they had to pay me the days back. They were very cross about, but it was their fault for miscalculating staffing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Fake: Anon is employed

    Gay: Anon gets fucked by his employer

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Not fuck life. Fuck your boss

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Pretty sure they have to give you cash for them when they expire

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    That used to be true, but many companies moved to Personal Time Off(PTO) instead which doesn't have that requirement. Will vary by state and country, but I can confirm in Florida and Gerogia in the US that it's use it or lose it. No payout necessary, even if laid off.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They do not, unless you have an employment contract that says otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Hell - here's how fucked up it is - my SO worked in clinic that wasn't open on holidays, but offered no holiday pay, so employees had to use the 10 or 14 vaca days they got to cover their 7 holidays, which they couldn't have worked if they wanted to. 'Ready, able, and willing' is how the law is worded, for salaried employees. But these things are meaningless relics of old times when labor had some power and wasn't just the fleshlight of the rich.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    my SO worked in clinic that wasn’t open on holidays, but offered no holiday pay, so employees had to use the 10 or 14 vaca days they got to cover their 7 holidays, which they couldn’t have worked if they wanted to.

    That sucks. I get 9ish holiday days/year (ish because sometimes we work New Years and get the holiday day for it the previous year) and we start at 2 weeks vacation in addition, with it going up with seniority, eventually capping out at 5 weeks. It is use it, sell it or lose it though - new vacation is granted at start of year and expires at end of year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I believe my country (Canada) mandates this.

    However, I've had employers that simply paid out your vacation pay on every paycheque, it was a pittance of like $30 if that....

    So they never "accumulated" any vacation time for workers and couldn't give any fewer shits if you took your vacation or not. They would only give a shit if you took too much time off for vacation.

    Beyond that, you're on your own.

    I never took vacation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I actually disagree with this. Then employers can pay employees less and say "well then you should just not take time off". It'll make situations where people cannot afford to take their holidays. If anything, you should just have them automatically waiting in a stack at the end of the year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Rolling them over would be better, but most full time jobs do cash out your unused PTO onto the last paycheck of the financial year. Some jobs let you roll over a limited amount, and sometimes that amount increases each year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (3 children)

    that's so american brained it's comical. no dude, in normal countries you can't deduce benefits from the wage. "i can pay you less than minimum wage because you get tips" doesn't happen outside of corporatistan

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Idk what the criteria are, but I dont get paid for unused vacation. Idk if its a salary/hourly thing, paid/unpaid, or maybe state/country labor laws, but its not universal

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Pretty sure that's considered wage theft in all 50 states. But not surprised it happened to you, wage theft costs Americans more money than any other crime, literally billions of dollars annually. As far as I know there is no law enforcement proactively policing this stuff, anything that goes unreported goes uninvestgated and unprosecuted.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›