▲ 775 ▼ Anon saves up (sh.itjust.works) submitted 1 year ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works 103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 121 points 1 year ago (12 children) I'm guessing it was USA and they were just lost. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 19 points 1 year ago (8 children) They just get lost in the UK too, most places seem pretty good about making sure you take them though. At the first full time job I had in Oz there were a bunch of old dudes who had each accrued over a year in untaken annual leave. The company had to crack down on it and make them start taking it because it was a huge liability, both financially and as a risk to actually getting work done. They had to develop plans for them to take it a couple months at a time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] aim_at_me@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah this happened to me as a Kiwi living in the UK. First job over there. My boss just let me take them, even though they had all expired. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago What a champ! permalink fedilink source parent [–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Gosh, I'm quite shocked at the UK. They are not ally pretty good for workers rights. The worker in Australia may have accrued long service leave. It's a seperate entitlement that means younger 3 months leave at once,.on top of holiday entitlement, after working somewhere for 10 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Older contracts and union deals can be quite good in the UK. I would bet if this company doesn’t have a union that newer employees would be limited in the number of days they can transfer to the next year, likely less than a week. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago Yeah the company I worked for let you shift 5 but you had to take them within the first 3 months permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago No no, this was multiple old guys and in addition to long service leave, they just never took leave. For the UK I think the policy is in support of worker rights, in a round about kind of way. If you let people pay it out then they might never take leave and won't get the benefits of actually having had a break from work. permalink fedilink source parent [–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Won't mine don't. If you still have days they either make you take them or they pay them out, about 3 years ago I had about a week due and it was around Christmas I wanted to take the week before Christmas off but it wasn't an option and they had to pay me the days back. They were very cross about, but it was their fault for miscalculating staffing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago Interesting, I got the impression it was a regulatory requirement. My wife's firm did the same thing, but maybe it was just company policies where we worked. permalink fedilink source parent [–] skip0110@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago Yup. The only thing you can count on from your employer is what they have already given you. I don’t believe any promises. permalink fedilink source parent [–] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If I got paid out for my vacations, I would not take my vacations ever. Probably a good thing they don’t pay them out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 19 points 1 year ago (8 children) They just get lost in the UK too, most places seem pretty good about making sure you take them though. At the first full time job I had in Oz there were a bunch of old dudes who had each accrued over a year in untaken annual leave. The company had to crack down on it and make them start taking it because it was a huge liability, both financially and as a risk to actually getting work done. They had to develop plans for them to take it a couple months at a time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] aim_at_me@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah this happened to me as a Kiwi living in the UK. First job over there. My boss just let me take them, even though they had all expired. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago What a champ! permalink fedilink source parent [–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Gosh, I'm quite shocked at the UK. They are not ally pretty good for workers rights. The worker in Australia may have accrued long service leave. It's a seperate entitlement that means younger 3 months leave at once,.on top of holiday entitlement, after working somewhere for 10 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Older contracts and union deals can be quite good in the UK. I would bet if this company doesn’t have a union that newer employees would be limited in the number of days they can transfer to the next year, likely less than a week. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago Yeah the company I worked for let you shift 5 but you had to take them within the first 3 months permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago No no, this was multiple old guys and in addition to long service leave, they just never took leave. For the UK I think the policy is in support of worker rights, in a round about kind of way. If you let people pay it out then they might never take leave and won't get the benefits of actually having had a break from work. permalink fedilink source parent [–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Won't mine don't. If you still have days they either make you take them or they pay them out, about 3 years ago I had about a week due and it was around Christmas I wanted to take the week before Christmas off but it wasn't an option and they had to pay me the days back. They were very cross about, but it was their fault for miscalculating staffing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago Interesting, I got the impression it was a regulatory requirement. My wife's firm did the same thing, but maybe it was just company policies where we worked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aim_at_me@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah this happened to me as a Kiwi living in the UK. First job over there. My boss just let me take them, even though they had all expired. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago What a champ! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Gosh, I'm quite shocked at the UK. They are not ally pretty good for workers rights. The worker in Australia may have accrued long service leave. It's a seperate entitlement that means younger 3 months leave at once,.on top of holiday entitlement, after working somewhere for 10 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Older contracts and union deals can be quite good in the UK. I would bet if this company doesn’t have a union that newer employees would be limited in the number of days they can transfer to the next year, likely less than a week. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago Yeah the company I worked for let you shift 5 but you had to take them within the first 3 months permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago No no, this was multiple old guys and in addition to long service leave, they just never took leave. For the UK I think the policy is in support of worker rights, in a round about kind of way. If you let people pay it out then they might never take leave and won't get the benefits of actually having had a break from work. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Older contracts and union deals can be quite good in the UK. I would bet if this company doesn’t have a union that newer employees would be limited in the number of days they can transfer to the next year, likely less than a week. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago Yeah the company I worked for let you shift 5 but you had to take them within the first 3 months permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago Yeah the company I worked for let you shift 5 but you had to take them within the first 3 months permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago No no, this was multiple old guys and in addition to long service leave, they just never took leave. For the UK I think the policy is in support of worker rights, in a round about kind of way. If you let people pay it out then they might never take leave and won't get the benefits of actually having had a break from work. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Won't mine don't. If you still have days they either make you take them or they pay them out, about 3 years ago I had about a week due and it was around Christmas I wanted to take the week before Christmas off but it wasn't an option and they had to pay me the days back. They were very cross about, but it was their fault for miscalculating staffing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago Interesting, I got the impression it was a regulatory requirement. My wife's firm did the same thing, but maybe it was just company policies where we worked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago Interesting, I got the impression it was a regulatory requirement. My wife's firm did the same thing, but maybe it was just company policies where we worked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] skip0110@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago Yup. The only thing you can count on from your employer is what they have already given you. I don’t believe any promises. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If I got paid out for my vacations, I would not take my vacations ever. Probably a good thing they don’t pay them out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago permalink fedilink source parent