all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 1 year ago

Makes sense.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The bodyguard holding the briefcase is wearing something enormous under their jacket, and look ridiculous.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I thought he was so loved by everyone, why does he need bodyguards?

    /S obviously

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    How much range does it have? I doubt it can stop a well-aimed full-speed kamikaze

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    It works by physically ramming the incoming drone, so it probably can knock things off course

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    FPV drones can go over 160 km/h, and can carry thermobaric warheads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I can't pretend to be an expert on these things, but this is also a drone and it does not need to carry the weight of a large battery or an explosive payload. Surely it should be expected to at least match the performance of the incoming drone?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's much harder to hit something going 160 km/h than to hit something static with a munition going 160 km/h.

    And a thermobaric munition is like the miniaturised version of the MOAB that the US was busting bunkers with in Afghanistan.

    Point is, even if it hits the drone 100 m away, I don't think that would be safe for the target. The primary defense is still jamming, but that is ineffective against wire-guided stuff.

    It's not useless, but I don't think Putin is safe either. It could also be a cope cage like thing, where the point is just the appearance of safety to calm Putin's nerves and to discourage attackers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments