Security researchers at Google and Microsoft say they have evidence that hackers backed by China are exploiting a zero-day bug in Microsoft SharePoint, as companies around the world scramble to patch the flaw.

The bug, known officially as CVE-2025-53770 and discovered last weekend, allows hackers to steal sensitive private keys from self-hosted versions of SharePoint, a software server widely used by companies and organizations to store and share internal documents. Once exploited, an attacker can use the bug to remotely plant malware and gain access to the files and data stored within, as well as gain access to other systems on the same network.

top 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 1 year ago (6 children)

That’s not a zero-day… Really dislike media that waters down or misuse terminology

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Well, it's a zero day for 24 hours, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yepp - it was, but that day was 11. June

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I don't think that's true either, based on the reporting it's based on a bug disclosed at a hacking conference in May. No clue how this is a zero day if it's based on a 2 month old bug reported to the vendor.

    Seems more like bog standard Microsoft fucking around and waiting too long to patch before it got used.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    SharePoint is a nightmare. 😥

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Agree. I work with an org that uses SharePoint, I don't. When they share docs with me, I can't directly transfer (or maybe I haven't found how) to One drive. I mean, they are both MS Cloud. Why?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    almost makes one forget this is a problem that Microsoft created.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 29 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    The attack exploits SharePoint vulnerabilities originally disclosed at a Berlin hacking competition in May, where a Vietnamese cybersecurity researcher received a $100,000 bounty for discovering the flaws. Reuters reported that Microsoft was allegedly informed of the vulnerabilities in May but failed to fully address them in an initial July patch

    And

    Several cybersecurity experts compared the SharePoint campaign to the 2021 Microsoft Exchange server attacks that compromised US government systems. Former FBI Cyber Unit deputy director Cynthia Kaiser warned that hackers "already in their systems may lie dormant for extended periods before operationalizing"

    Just shows in what a poor position US is now. Allies discovered it, reported it, feds didn't prepare for it and Chinese are in. Incredible incompetence except for US allies that despite US' isolationism still care.

    Source

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah; allies still care because of the US military industrial complex. Compromising the US still compromises a large chunk of the world, making things even worse for everyone than the current US administration can do on its own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    This is what you get when you don't patch your shit after being told about it MONTHS before it was demonstrated, and MONTHS after.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    This is a zero-day bug though?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I did.. It looks like the bug has been exploited for a couple of weeks now, with a patch only being released on 20th of July? That makes it zero-day

    The bug is regarded as a zero-day because the vendor — Microsoft, in this case — had no time to issue a patch before it was actively exploited.

    Edit: realised we might have different definition of zero day. Depends whether you consider that the vendor didn't know about the issue, or there isn't a patch available upon exploitation of the vulnerability.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Zero day is typically defined as there being zero days since the vulnerability is known to the developer, in other words, it being unknown at the time of the exploit.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-day_vulnerability?wprov=sfla1

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Ah thank you. I thought zero day and 1 day vulnerabilities were: 0-day = vulnerability is not known to the vendor and so there is no patch. If exploited, it is a 0-day attack. 1-day = vulnerability is known and patch is available, but not all systems are patched.

    I.E. the actual number of days doesn't matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    When I say things like, "Use linux, the attack surface is much smaller", people say, "well, that won't last forever", to which I say, "if a trillion dollar company can drop the ball like this, I'm taking the route less travelled because society doesn't change quickly, Microsoft isn't going anywhere in my forseeable future"

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    More primitive anti-china propaganda. Who believes this thick nonsense ? The western Plutocracy are really firing it up ! Imagine that the fascist techlords are now suddenly 'trustworthy' good guys - and joining up with 'national security' in a little ww3-mongering propaganda campaign. I'm sure there's no cheating and the evidence would hold up - if anyone ever got to check it out oc.. tsk tsk..

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment