I was editing one of my posts and saw a "View votes" in the dropdown hamburger for the post. Now I can see who serial downvotes. Nice.

all 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 102 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Thank you, I had been wondering who downvoted a long string of my comments a couple days ago

    I still have no idea why, but it's funny that I can just go look at their profile. It's tempting to just downvote a bunch of their similarly innocuous comments but that seems dumb lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Be the bigger person and start upvoting their shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    I upvote all your posts, like a tic or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I’m flattered but also concerned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Tying votes to accounts is pretty much required by the way activity-pub works; an upvote is basically the same as a heart/like on old Twitter and with federation it needs to know where the vote is coming from and where it’s going.

    Piefed has an option to try to circumvent this by creating a second, “fake” account with no obvious connection to your own account and sends all your votes using that account. If the instance doesn’t have many accounts, though, it can still be obvious who’s voting.

    As others have mentioned, other front ends or services can show the votes publicly to anyone who wants to see it. Even on other platforms that use a voting system one should always assume the votes are tied to one’s account.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Piefed stopped that actually and now instead have an option to not have your votes federate to other instance entirely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    How does the algorithm work then for hot and top?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Never assume anything you do on servers you don't own are private. In fact don't even do it then, encrypt that shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
    -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
    
    wV4Dd2cMziIkKJkSAQdAQKmr1kGoimmaRmO19Z8qT/EWx2yuDJNuatwbO57jWB0w
    uCogyRYU3FNpw5AiXXV0x3CWrmzRiIWVZw1DR6ctCL430oh1Iim/MQS/3WaG/MIv
    0sAGAblZp623P1Zw0chivhpQ9kkHSujeEVy+IcaktEkfoDTFs1SxjpWM22ny+eP/
    ifRudikZ4f41BNOPMrsi2baeKnD/nwL30gxET20l1IJr2DuugfNrcGFIK1JSNt+T
    Xr4eudiB3RpPareo7c/jiu6/fVVM0SODcmwk4pCxzAorDgzsRPINn/63tPL5raIZ
    Kaf7jxuv25l8dlRo/iQdEnJUFq/bAjd7B9a1art4PIix5Y4R8z+/c2DMrqusdrQn
    LtY4koMJil7z
    =TZ+w
    -----END PGP MESSAGE-----
    
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I thought you need a public key to read it or some sht, idr how pgp works

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    You do. That comment of mine, as is, is entirely worthless.

    The sender (in this case, that would be me) needs to encrypt the message using either:

    1. The public key of the recipient
    2. A custom passphrase
    3. Any combination of the above, including multiple different public keys

    That way, the only people who can decrypt the message is a person with the private key that is paired with any of the public keys that the message was encrypted with OR literally anybody that happens to have the passphrase it was encrypted with.

    I think I had encrypted that message using just my own public key, so as I said, the message is completely useless to anybody but myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • Literally everyone can see how anyone votes. Others have mentioned lemvotes already.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Users can do this too via the website lemvotes.org.

    It's also a feature of Tesseract (but isn't as easy to use).

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    What if you voted but then un-voted? Is that visible?

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    To be fair, I have a small handful of troll accounts that I tag and downvote whenever I see them posting. Sometimes they go on a posting tangent and I end up with a string of downvoting which looks bad without context

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's one of the things that I don't like about Lemmy. But unless there's better service that's not centralized I guess I will remain here for at least some time.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Voting is kind of lame IMO. I wish it would die with Reddit. Large or small votes, my feed always seems to still be what it is, and I don't filter by votes or anything like that. Don't pay it much attention other than to maybe acknowledge the person above me.

    Actually if my local community subreddit taught me anything, I've often got more in common with the downvoted folks.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    A bot that reveals that behaviour to the community would be very helpful.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago*

    It's weird people constantly say mods have magic powers...

    And I almost never see lemvotes mentioned.

    Admins have a much easier time, that's why all the communities that ban people for down voting are moderated by admins of tiny instances.

    Im pretty sure if they're not an admin of an instance (there's a lot of small ones out there) the mods are just using lemvotes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That would be helpful. The only problem is, I've found a person that is definitely a serial downvoter, but I can't ban them because they don't make comments. I guess I'll ask the admin to do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments