all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 80 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If you think this will finally bring about a reckoning, let me point out that Microsoft's stock price is up on the day.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    That's the thing from the customer IT perspective. When your Microsoft-administered systems go down at the same time as the rest of the world, nobody blames the CTO or any of the sysadmins. The global outage becomes an acknowledgement that it's not their fault, so nobody in the company actually gets blamed, and nobody gives them a hard time.

    It might not result in more uptime, but it does mean that any downtime doesn't get pinned on them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I think it goes even further than that. The thinking is that if the professionals at Microsoft can’t even figure this out, how are our in-house sysadmins going to keep a system on line, or deal with it when something bad happens? The possibility of incompetence at Microsoft simply never enters consideration.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child)

    The answer has been staring us in the face and laughing at us.

    It's on-prem.

    They're in the middle of massive fraud to price us out of doing so.

    All of these calls are being made from inside the house.

    The answer is, you will own nothing, and fuck you wait a little bit until it's profitable for us to make more profit.

    We either burn them down or they burn us down. We have a lot of means we haven't tried yet. Organize. No matter the next option, the first step is organize.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 18 hours ago

    The answer to what? As I pointed out earlier, Microsoft’s stock price went up following this event. This is just not an issue to the business people in the world. They’re perfectly fine with how dependent on the cloud they are, and would rather leave the technical issues around recovery from outages like this to Microsoft. If anything, this is a reminder to business people that, if they hosted services on-prem, they’d have to pay people who had the skills and expertise to recover from outages like this, and that’s most definitely not something they’re interested in doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    I'm okay with LibreOffice.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Which is fine if you don't need Excel. Business, however, does.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago

    You are not incorrect about this. However, every time I see an abomination with macros and external calls made in excel I want to shoot the head department for such heresy (yes, usually they are between departments and they call this shit "apps". Just fucking kill me)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I understand buying the service from a reliable vendor, but if you're a gigantic organisation it seems insane to have it running on the same infrastructure as all their other clients.

    Why set it up so if you break something you break the whole world?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Microsoft security products including Microsoft Defender and Intune have been impacted by the outage

    Who decided that was a good idea. The last time I used a windows antivirus it downloaded virus definitions and then scanned using those definitions, if it wasn't able to connect to the web it was non-issue. When did that change.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    I'm off this week, but we just switched from Cisco Jabber to MS Teams this year. My team wanted to go to WebEx but the execs told us no. I'm interested to see what the fallout was when I get back on Monday

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    teams was mostly up the entire time I think? All I lost was the org chart and the ability to send meetings

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    We're moving from Cisco to Vonage, and oh boy does it suck. The webpage was eating every ounce of RAM it could get its hands on. They fixed the memory leak after a week of terrible performance so it was at least usable, but it's a straight downgrade. There was enough pushback that they stopped the rollout, but they're planning on bringing it back after the holidays. Can't wait.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    I guess there’s now a market for backup email servers for medium to large corporations. I wonder how much automation broke.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I've been yelling about this for a long time and nobody listens. At least they might, now.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment