all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 22 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] 24 points 1 day ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)
  • [–] 24 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    We aren't idolizing mediocre programming, that's why we dislike AI

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 45 points 1 day ago

    It is not about being a simp or whatever that means. It is about LLM's being trained on licensed data and the output being a transformation (literally a collection of functions) of that data. Meaning that it is virtually a certainty that the output without a license notice is a violation on the license of the data it was trained.

    Not to mention all the others shit show that AI's companies do , are trying to accomplish and stand for.

  • source
  • If it's stupid, but it works, it's me, at work

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Thank you for letting me know so clearly that you would like to be added to my blocklist!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    The username wasnt enough? ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 19 hours ago*

    Voyager cuts that off so until I started digging a bit into the post history I couldn't see beyond the first half or so of the name, and (obviously) it was actually a surprise what the second part revealed.

    Though retrospectively yes, if I had been able to see the whole name from the start then it definitely would have been a good clue. πŸ˜‚

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

    As much as I despise AI, if people are using it to identify kernel vulnerabilities then there's really no choice but to try to stay one step ahead of them. It's really sad.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

    That's quite a bit different than including LLM written (not merely checked) vibecode directly into the kernel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Yup, easier to decide to break up with it.

  • source
  • [+] -6 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    Honestly, I have yet to see a single example of how the linux kernel is ruined because of AI. You know why? Because I'm not a kernel developer! In fact, I'm not a developer at all! All I see is, linux is working fine.

    When is the last time your kernel broke? When is the last time AI caused the linux kernel to fail or falter? Not saying it never will happen, but I've yet to hear about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment