
post
Easier now, harder later
is this the sex community ?
We aren't idolizing mediocre programming, that's why we dislike AI
It is not about being a simp or whatever that means. It is about LLM's being trained on licensed data and the output being a transformation (literally a collection of functions) of that data. Meaning that it is virtually a certainty that the output without a license notice is a violation on the license of the data it was trained.
Not to mention all the others shit show that AI's companies do , are trying to accomplish and stand for.
Thank you for letting me know so clearly that you would like to be added to my blocklist!
The username wasnt enough? ;)
Voyager cuts that off so until I started digging a bit into the post history I couldn't see beyond the first half or so of the name, and (obviously) it was actually a surprise what the second part revealed.
Though retrospectively yes, if I had been able to see the whole name from the start then it definitely would have been a good clue. π
Holy shit. Indeed I do! Sign me up.
I never expected this. I didn't see it coming. It was all so sudden. But if you have to, do it.
As much as I despise AI, if people are using it to identify kernel vulnerabilities then there's really no choice but to try to stay one step ahead of them. It's really sad.
That's quite a bit different than including LLM written (not merely checked) vibecode directly into the kernel.
Honestly, I have yet to see a single example of how the linux kernel is ruined because of AI. You know why? Because I'm not a kernel developer! In fact, I'm not a developer at all! All I see is, linux is working fine.
When is the last time your kernel broke? When is the last time AI caused the linux kernel to fail or falter? Not saying it never will happen, but I've yet to hear about it.

all 23 comments