1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 22 hours ago

I gave up after a few section that just read like a really long attempted justification for "business efficiency" that never actually addresses why the REFRIGERATORS AT A STORE MANNED 24/7 need to be able to be remote controlled and on the network 24/7.

It just lays out a series of shortsighted cost cutting decision and says "well they were all logical steps, so it's reasonable that we ended up here, and actually any other outcome is basically impossible" when that's exactly what we're saying. Someone should have pushed back (and probably did) but cost cutting and "just make it easy" probably overrode them.

The S stands for security in both IoT and OT it seems

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/cybersecurity@infosec.pub view that post
    [–] 8 points 18 hours ago (1 child)

    "Operational technology (OT) is the hardware and software that directly monitors, controls and automates physical processes and infrastructure in industrial settings."

    (Source)

    It might give a definition somewhere in the article, but not the first few pages, which was too frustrating to continue. Now I can go back and read it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

    Working in IT/OT, It's a neverending battle:

    OT wants to open things up. A huge amount of utility is gained when things can be monitored and operated remotely.

    IT wants to lock things down. Access to systems should be reduced to the minimum amount possible to lower the risk of Bad Things happening.

    The battlefront shifts back and forth depending on business needs and budget.

  • source
  • parent
  • 1 comment in c/security@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

    OT

    “of Things,” or something else? Did they coin this just now, because I’ve never seen it before.

    ETA: “Operational Technology” https://www.cisco.com/site/us/en/learn/topics/industrial-iot/what-is-ot-vs-it.html

  • source