all 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 1 day ago (8 children)

But chatgpt actually sucks though, its one of the worse ones.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    When deepseek came out I never looked back.

    Open source should be the standard for supposedly world ending technology.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 23 hours ago* (2 children)

    Locally run AI should be the standard. All you have to do is download a .gguf file from hugging face (around 8 gig) and load it into Koboldcpp's GUI... Or AnythingLLM if Kobolcpp is too technical for you.

    Some models run faster, others run slower (depending on hardware, model size, and structure). Models like LFM2.5 for instance runs pretty fast because it's more like 3 small models cowriting responses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    Minimal viable local AI that can actually solve problems in agentic mode is qwen 3.8 dense/flash. You are looking at fat ass pc with 16 gb vram 64 ram for flash or 32vram for dense.

    Maybe if not for AI bubble prices on hardware, that would be affordable. But today it costs a whole lot for a machine that ideally shouldn't be the same you are working on - cause whatever you use will eat vram/ram.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 15 hours ago*

    If by "solving problems" you mean - you yell your criteria at it enough times that it actually listens and does what you asked for half an hour ago... then sure.

    Let's face it, most of the time that's what interacting with AI is like. It feels like repeatly asking for the same thing and getting variations that you didn't really ask for... Then eventually settling for what it's done.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    After reading these comments it has become clear to me that all of you are extremely selfish, and don't care that there are billionaires out there not wanting to use their supposed wealth to further their evil endeavors. Shame on you all! I bet you are all also not even using the ram you have and just squandering it instead of helping these helpless idiots destroy humanity.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

    The VCs I've spoken with have all said it's important to remember that you're not really investing in technology, you're investing in the people behind it. Literately vibe-based, personal likability trumps usefulness in their minds.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Just a bit more money, and I promise we'll have it be good.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 21 hours ago*

    See, what we do is run an LLM, and when it makes mistakes, we will have another LLM supervise and correct it. Of course, that LLM will also make mistakes, but it's okay because will just have another LLM to supervise the 2nd one! Of course that LLM...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Based on their latest round the answer to this is apparently $0 unless you already invested and you want to throw good money after bad trying to keep the grift going.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 15 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago* (2 children)

    1℅ better *if I receive subsidies, devour natural resources unsustainably to the detriment of entire cities, and you allow me alone to determine my chatbot efficacy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Why is he in the Rovers Return?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 16 hours ago

    1% based on my calculations. Totally not biased or anything.

  • source