"In hindsight, it was a mistake for SpaceX to send (Ukraine) thousands of free Starlink dishes and millions of dollars a month in free service at the beginning of the war," the post reads.

Paywall?

all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 35 points 2 days ago* (3 children)

The American people paid for them fuckwit

Corporate welfare gave you everything you have

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Europe did as well. An astronomic price for internet service

    The huge amount of money being paid for Ukraine to have Starlink/Starshield access contributed to SoaceX's ridiculous valuation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 2 days ago

    Move to Russia already you traitor dirtbag

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    In hindsight, it was a mistake for SpaceX to send (Ukraine) thousands of free Starlink dishes

    It was a mistake for Ukraine to accept them too, if you ask me. Becoming dependent on a mercurial neo-Nazi like Musk is not a smart idea. But I guess needs must when the devil drives.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    There isn't any alternative. It was either to take it from Musk or to struggle without communication and die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 days ago

    In war, even a short lived advantage, is still an advantage.

    They didn't become solely reliant on it, they still use fiber drones and other lower bandwidth rf alternatives.

    They were smart in their application and have politicized the waiver starlink support very effectively.

    Overall I believe they've done a fantastic job adapting to their available options. Semper Gumby.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 day ago*

    congress should just nationalize starlink (and spacex) if our defense posture depends on it. No company exec should be able to influence our foreign policy at his whim. The company will operate just fine without Musk, if not better.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    The mistake was to use starlink for a mission critical purposes.

    No more government money for starlink

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 days ago

    The mistake was to use starlink for us government purposes, including allowing it organizing totally uncontrolled communications of the white house, who knows what classified info was shared this time with russia or the other dictators.

    The second mistake was to give starlink/spacex any subsidies at all, a company claiming to be that big can easily stand on its own legs.

    Another oops was the dismantling of the respected NASA in favor of spaceX to let it decide on anything spacefaring.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    No one should be using starlink. It has been shown to be completely untrustworthy as a service both by Elon and how it has been used and abused by foreign governments.

    The sooner Europe, China and all these other regions build their own, the better.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    Yes, because even more satellites in lLEO is exactly what humanity needs right now, we still. Don't have enough pollution and Kessler was just a pussy, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Kessler syndrome isn't a big problem in LEO relatively speaking as everything there will fall quickly if not boosted

    But pollution is real

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Unlikely

    It still requires time if we were talking about complete satellites, but we're not

    Two satellites collide and you'll have millions if not billions of particles of all kinds of sizes that will stay there for years. Each of those xab damage or explode (if big enough) other satellites. Yes, I'm explaining what Kessler is here, but the point is that it will take years if not decades for Leo to clean up enough to be able to launch anything through that mess and during that time the satellites that were there, well, no longer are.

    It WILL be a problem. We have hundreds of satellites at countless altitudes, but starlink just exploded the amount of shit satellites for that altitude. I never thought there would be a good application for it, but lo and behold, at least Ukraine can get good use out of them, good for them, in happy for them, but fuck everything else about starlink. I can see those craps flying through the sky at night, Elmo decided we didn't have enough garbage and pollution everywhere sonhe just decided to add a shit tonne to it.

    Now Europe wants its own? China too? Why not every country, then, because we're nsuxh a shitty species that we'd rather destroy ourselves over just cooperation with each other

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    If we could have a worldwide apolitical setup that made better use of the night sky that we love then that would be best, but we can't. The ability to communicate in this way is a geopolitical necessity in any modern warfare. Space and AI are the new arms race

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Sieze his assets and deport him back to South Africa

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    is this why they keep emailing me ads even though I told them to remove me for the past 3 years?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment