no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
3 comments in c/science@lemmy.ml view that post
[–] 10 points 3 days ago

This makes sense, and a another good argument against monoculture farming.

Anecdotally, we have friends in a inner suburb of Tokyo who say there's been a surge in Tanuki hanging around the neighborhood. Apparently they've been attracted by people land-banking - growing small quantities of permission trees on vacant land so it counts as a 'farm' to avoid vacant land taxes, then not harvesting the fruit because it's not economically sensible... the fruit then attracts wildlife.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Fascinating. So in essence symbiotic systems are collapsing. But that's not to say that no Wildlife will be present just different Wildlife wouldn't it?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 3 days ago

    Different but less diverse… really interesting find indeed! I would guess there would be exceptions and it definitely depends on the type of agricultural farmland you are considering

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/environment@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 10 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    I wonder if its a temporary effect. My hypothesis is the area will adapt to non-human presence and adjust species, plant types, etc over time.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment