Lawmakers in the U.K. say smart glasses raise serious questions about consent and privacy.

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 16 hours ago (1 child)
[–] 2 points 17 hours ago

The Yay-Bans and Nay-Bans will be arguing over this topic.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 14 hours ago

    But they still don't have night vision? Pff.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 14 hours ago*

    Is Major Bans related to Ray Bans ? And why was he not visible without smart glasses?

  • source
  • 9 comments in c/pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub view that post

    Major Bans

    I see what you did there

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (7 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    It's a shame that we've developed covert network-connected spycams widely available from some of the most dangerously centralized organizations ever conceived, yeah

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    It's really shameful, because people with vision impairments could use something like these without being reliant on said networks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    They could easily be medical condition access only. It’s not like this option is taken off the table.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Without being reliant on Spycorp Inc?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago* (2 children)

    No of course spycorp gonna then try and argue anything with eyeballs = impairment.

    I do feel those with visual impairment is a good tech case. But it needs to be highly regulated on both side.

    FTR I hate the things. And big tech can’t be trusted. However the tech still has a reasonable purpose if big tech could keep its big nose out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 2 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 3 points 14 hours ago

    The UK looking at recording devices out in public and considering other people's privacy and consent?

    Cool, now apply it to the govt's surveillance network. Or is this only for the peasants?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago