Google, Meta and TikTok filed separate lawsuits seeking to block a California law designed to protect children from the risks of social media, arguing that it violates their First Amendment rights.

The law, which is scheduled to go into effect on Jan. 1, 2027, prohibits tech companies from offering addictive feeds, endless scrolling and autoplayed videos to kids under 16. They must also implement “reasonable measures” to make sure those under 16 are not given access to the addictive features by verifying users’ ages. Gov. Gavin Newsom signed it into law in September.

The companies each filed their lawsuits in federal courts in San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Jose, California. In addition to the First Amendment, TikTok, Meta and Google argue that the law violates Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which shields tech companies from liability for material posted on their sites by third parties.

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 27 points 5 days ago

The main problem is how a user's age is verified for laws like this. Why not just make the same law apply to the entire platform? I think all of us could benefit from less addictive social media.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 5 days ago (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 5 days ago

    Corporations should have no rights.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 5 days ago

    Why do people HATE us?

    -Companies SUING to STOP Child Protection Laws!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 child)

    Pretty sure since they're under 18, they should be protected, regardless of any stupid fucking company bullshit.

    Go figure they're trying to play the first amendment card. But since companies aren't people, nor are they the press (repost/sharing by users doesn't count), they don't fall under constitutional protections IMO.

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    Source

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago

    addictive feeds, endless scrolling and autoplayed videos

    All great examples of free speech. Up there wired money

  • source
  • Are they out of their minds?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Why didn't corporations sue to prevent government id verification of users?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    autoplayed videos

    I mean, that's basically what television is.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment