How can I find a local coding LLM that wasn't trained on copyleft code?

It's an ethical concern, not a legal one, so if the data collection doesn't entirely rule out copyleft, that might be OK

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What's wrong with copyleft code?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

    Nothing in itself. I just felt it was antithetical to the intention behind copyleft to train on it then share the result.

    It's a good question, I'll think on it more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    I don't see why it would be. Isn't 'copyleft' basically: "You may modify and redistribute this code for free, but whatever you produce with it has to be copyleft as well"?

    Extending that to coding agents trained on copyleft code, I would say that any code that agent writes is also copyleft. How is that anti-ethical?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    You're probably looking for explicitly public domain code, not just avoiding copyleft. That will be rare to find. Permissive licenses such as MIT share with GPL and other copyleft licenses the aspect that they require attribution, while LLMs act as an attribution stripper.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Olmo might be the closest you can get

    https://allenai.org/olmo (website straight up crashes my phone)

    https://huggingface.co/allenai/OLMo-7B

    Olmo is trained on the Dolma dataset, “a diverse mixture of web content, scientific papers, code, public-domain books, social media, and encyclopedic materials”, so this might be a more ethical source, but I’m not sure if it’s copyleft free.

    https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.00159

    You could rent a cluster of GPUs and remove copyleft material and retrain

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)

    Dolma uses starcoder https://huggingface.co/blog/starcoder, which

    are Large Language Models for Code (Code LLMs) trained on permissively licensed data from GitHub

    so this might do. Thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (1 child)

    Just because code isn't copyleft doesn't mean it does not require attribution or consent to being scraped by LLMs!

    Also, I don't think there's any model out there that has asked for permission for scraping, and if any claim they do, they're almost certainly liars.

    In my opinion, you should ideally avoid LLMs if you can do the task yourself. It definitely has some genuine applications, especially translation, but functionally, ethically, and legally, it is not a suitable option for most people.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    Just because code isn’t copyleft doesn’t mean it does not require attribution or consent to being scraped by LLMs!

    I am painfully aware. For my own work, I don't use LLMs, but I'm not convinced I'm going to be able to do that at work. I'm trying to work out the details of what that means and if it's irretrievably immoral. It's not looking good.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    So you want an LLM that says they don't train on "copyleft" code, even if they do, so you can virtue signal to yourself without facing any kind of real inconvenience?

    How about you start by clarifying what you mean by "copyleft" as that's not a standard term, and it means different things to different people. I've seen it used to refer to MIT style licenses, GPL style licenses, and public domain stuff... All of which are very different things.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments