This was...weird. apparently wikipedia was hacked or something? Visiting Wikipedia, I'm seeing this undismissable modal that blocks access to the page.

I was trying to read:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_elections

It looks like this was a rogue asshole who took over that page actually. Because after many refreshes.. now it appears to be a blank page and says it was recently edited by some user.

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 60 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Looking at the revision history, it looks like it was vandalized and then reverted five minutes later (and the vandalizing editor was blocked from making edits).

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    Yeah I agree but my first thought was it must've been something more because of the full screen dialogue. I assumed a page itself could not have something like that embedded. But I admittedly know not much

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    It can just not without someone noticing. It's one of those "against the rules, not against reality" kind of things, so it makes sense it was reverted quickly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Does that mean editors can insert arbitrary html/css?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Absolutely.

    Wikipedia isn't wholly unprotected from vandalism and other such attacks, they always keep a post history, users without an account are logged, admins can lock pages or ban people, and I dunno all the details but some things can cause an automatic rollback, but yeah.

    There's nothing stopping me from messing with styles, content, inserting external links to things. If I do it in a way that's against the rules, there's also nothing stopping someone from reverting all my changes in a couple of clicks and banning me or my IP. If someone was truly malicious and used a VPN to dodge bans, that'll get a page locked from everyone and make edits need to be approved, which is much more common for political pages.

    But yeah, Wikipedia is open, and that means open.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 days ago

    What a way to mark oneself as "not a child" who is "ready for certain topics". Bless the Wikipedia volunteers.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Not a big surprise that the US election article for the current election gets vandalised...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago

    As soon (2026-11-04T14:15Z) as I stumbled upon this thread, I tried to access a (not so) random article, and it seems like Wikipedia is functioning normally:

    Screenshot of Fennec browser displaying the Wikipedia article  entitled "Screech owl" in dark, desktop mode.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Hmmm I wonder why anyone would treat this person like a child 🙄

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    It's like when Neelix became obsessed with boobs but with less boobs

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    For anyone else coming across it, it looks like they also hid the revisions as "disruptive" so the edits as a whole don't show in revision history anymore but you can see the revision visibility edit on the actual page logs.

  • source