all 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 114 points 1 week ago (9 children)

They already had them ordered by state, why not list the state?

Alabama
Shomari Figures
Terri Sewell

California
Mike Thompson
John Garamendi
Josh Harder
Mark DeSaulnier
Nancy Pelosi
Adam Gray
Jimmy Panetta
Raul Ruiz
Norma Torres

Connecticut
John Larson

Florida
Darren Soto
Kathy Castor
Jared Moskowitz

Georgia
Lucy McBath

Hawaii
Ed Case

Illinois
Brad Schneider
Eric Sorensen

Indiana
Frank Mrvan

Maine
Jared Golden

Maryland
Steny Hoyer

Massachusetts
Jake Auchincloss

Michigan
Hillary Scholten
Kristen McDonald Rivet
Haley Stevens

New Hampshire
Chris Pappas

New Jersey
Josh Gottheimer

New York
Tom Suozzi
Laura Gillen
Josh Riley

North Carolina
Don Davis
Deborah Ross

Ohio
Marcy Kaptur

Oregon
Janelle Bynum

Texas
Henry Cuellar
Vicente Gonzalez

Virginia
Eugene Vindman
Suhas Subramanyam

Washington
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    Why is Pelosi on this list? She isn’t even in office anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    She is not seeking reelection, but she is still in office until the end of this year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    So she had nothing to lose and still didn't do the right thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Janelle Bynum, the worst in my state of Oregon. Not my district though, and I think she still won primaries.

    These are the notes I have on her:
    Janelle Bynum

    • voted to table Trump impeachment
    • Voted to "express gratitude to ICE"
    • AIPAC
    • Did not vote to stop Israel aid
    • New Did not protest Ilhan Omar investigation

    She's textbook controlled opposition.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago

    Basically, this is the AIPAC donation slush fund list?

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Vote them out, as fast as possible. Of course Nancy Pelosi is among them. Corrupt market manipulator.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    Voting them out doesn’t work when the electorate is propagandized to believe they are good candidates. Changing politics in this country is going to have to start with grassroots community organizing. You are going to have to get out there and explain to as many people as possible that establishment Democrats are not on their side, and show that you are trustworthy by doing good work like mutual aid. If we just keep waiting for the election cycle to change things, nothing ever will.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 week ago

    Establishment swine. Imagine not condemning this outrageous Nazi bullshit. The rot runs deep, we need to primary every single one.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 week ago

    Support David Hogg in his work to modernize the democratic party.

    Tip to Republitards, investigate Melania instead, that's a sure win, because her Einstein Visa was complete bullshit.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago

    It seems only fair that investigations should be launched into all of them...a week before their next election. They don't seem to think that's out-of-bounds behavior, so they shouldn't mind.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (12 children)

    List of Democrats Who Did Not Sign Letter

    • Shomari Figures
    • Terri Sewell
    • Mike Thompson
    • John Garamendi
    • Josh Harder
    • Mark DeSaulnier
    • Nancy Pelosi
    • Adam Gray
    • Jimmy Panetta
    • Raul Ruiz
    • Norma Torres
    • John Larson
    • Darren Soto
    • Kathy Castor
    • Jared Moskowitz
    • Lucy McBath
    • Ed Case
    • Brad Schneider
    • Eric Sorensen
    • Frank Mrvan
    • Jared Golden
    • Steny Hoyer
    • Jake Auchincloss
    • Hillary Scholten
    • Kristen McDonald Rivet
    • Haley Stevens
    • Chris Pappas
    • Josh Gottheimer
    • Tom Suozzi
    • Laura Gillen
    • Josh Riley
    • Don Davis
    • Deborah Ross
    • Marcy Kaptur
    • Janelle Bynum
    • Henry Cuellar
    • Vicente Gonzalez
    • Eugene Vindman
    • Suhas Subramanyam
    • Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -31 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    Uh I'm a democrat and I wouldn't sign it either. This investigation didn't start with Trump, it was Obama and the initial investigation did find wrongdoing. I'm not an expert but I read they only dropped the case because the potential offense fell outside the five-year statute of limitations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    I mean, it seems to me that this would be more reason to oppose obviously political prosecution. If the alleged offenses can't be tried at this point anyways by your own point, then it's even more blatant that this is an attempt at election tampering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    It's obviously political prosecution, however, I feel like these Dem members know something we don't. According to the 2016 obama investigation, what she did was illegal and where there's smoke there's usually fire. I hope I'm wrong but my gut is telling me they actually have something on her.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    Could this response be any more "As a black man..."?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Sorry, vote blue no matter who voter my entire life. If you want to blindly support members of your party like it's a cult, I think you should join the republicans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    So we have you to blame for all the spineless cucks. They couldn’t get her on immigration stuff so now they’re doing it on something else and you’re like “oh but they probably know something.”

    Yeah.

    That AIPAC won’t continue to bribe them if they vote to protect Omar- and let’s be clear. She’s the low hanging fruit, but they’re gonna go after everyone who doesnt in line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    Did you just state you were a 'vote blue no matter who' voter, then in the next breath say something about 'blindly supporting members of your party like it's a cult'. No clue about the contradiction there?

    I doubt you're even an American at this point. Another bot sewing dissent? Just a dumbass?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    Well that's fucked, especially when Omar praised Nancy in her book. Remember reading that and thinking it was a mistake. She had zero praise for Sanders. Who to be honest was the reason she was part of the squad, not Nancy Pelosi.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago
    [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    wait, they are claiming she married her brother

  • source
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 week ago* (5 children)

    Blue no matter who*

    *Terms and conditions apply.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

    Blue no matter who, but also vote in primaries, where you can change the "who".

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gPBdBrqVCbtuy7f1bjOdCDUzEv5RqbbU1yYAr3KoHYE/edit?pli=1&gid=583502795#gid=583502795

    Check donors, check caucuses they are in. For example Blue Dogs caucus that's essentially Republicans who don't like trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Yeah I realized it this election. The primaries was actually very interesting in choices and candidates.

    The actual midterm ballot was milquetoast in choices and recommendations. The props were way more interesting than seeing yet another "do I choose moderate democrat who will change npthojg or MAGA republican?". The last 3 pages was just judges, and not even a choice: just " do you think this judge should retain their position? ".

    It's crazy more people don't take primaries seriously

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    California? Because the ballot sounds familiar.

    With the judges though I think it was just coincidence as there are still elections that all is to decide. These were because those judges term was going up and we were asked if the judge should be continue to hold the office for another term.

    I personally think that the governor should appoint judges, the Senate should confirm them and we should be able to vote them out (majority vote) in case they abuse their position.

    I think that voting out could be good for federal judges and SCOTUS as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Indeed. I don't know if that's unique to CA, but it's an odd phenomenon.

    I think your system does work better. As long as judges aren't going full Clarence Thomas, I generally shouldn't know the day to day news of a judicial representative. The whole point is to take a non-partisan stance, after all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago*

    To the right wing, EVERY strategy is on the table.

    For at least the last several decades, that has included running right-wing candidates pretending to be left who then win and never do anything left-leaning.

    The Democratic Party should change its name to the Greenhouse Party, because it's full of plants.

    And the Republican Party should change its name to the Outhouse Party, because it's full of shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    newsweek is a shitty ass rag. reddit uses it like crazy, sad to see it so often here too...

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Who gives a fucking shit what Nancy Pelosi does, is she even still alive?

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    I'd refuse to sign it, too.

    She was broke when she took office, now she's a multi-millionaire on her less than 200k salary. Her financial reporting is as sketchy as can be. Minnesota's welfare system has been looted with ongoing investigations of the theft of an absurd amount of money, tens of millions gone, with her staff involved.

    There's people serving decades in prison over it right now, use whatever news source you'd like to look into it.

    It's not a mystery, you'd have to be a fool to ignore her corruption. Even Maxine Waters is shaking her head.

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago

    I think most Americans marriages are fraudulent, truth be told.

  • source