all 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 43 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Wow this is actually great. Still doesn't excuse groups using Discord instead of traditional forums, because traditional forums are still browsable without an account. But the lack of indexing has been such a huge flaw with public groups using Discord. Addressing that issue goes a long way to making Discord a less shit platform for open source apps, games, etc. to run their support from.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    I'm confused how this will work tho. If I click on a search result that goes to discord will it take me to somewhere I can see it? I don't have a discord account. If it going to just take you to a login screen? I can't click reddit results anymore since they block VPN traffic without an account. So it seems like search results are just becoming less useful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    If I click on a search result that goes to discord will it take me to somewhere I can see it?

    I assume not, which is why I still think this is worse than using normal forums. You'll probably get a link to join the relevant server, and will probably require a Discord account to do it.

    Which is very annoying and unfortunate, but is a huge step up from all that content being entirely undiscoverable.

    It's possible that someone could write a bot that displays a mirror more exactly. Not sure how easy it'll be to both do that and not get taken down, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I mean for me personally this is worse because I will not make a discord account so the content is still unusable but now my search results are full of detritus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    I think you can tell most search engines to remove results from one particular source? So it should end up the same for you? If you can't do it natively, there are definitely extensions that'll do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    To be clear, this is really good - so much information has moved from being accessible on the open internet in the form of public forums, to being inaccessible in the form of public discord servers. This brings back that lost information.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    Seriously, the amount of times the only avenue to access information has been an expired invite link is ridiculous. Anyone who doesn't want their privacy violated should've got out of discord much sooner, the writing has been on the wall for years. Besides, plenty of the shit that's currently functionally private should actually be public.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I don't think there's even an expectation of privacy to be had on a public discord, in open channels. Closed channels are presumably not indexed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    From what I've read it is channels that the discord server owner/admins have flagged as discoverable and then users themselves have a setting to still hide their messages.

    This setting seems to be defaults to hide unless you are in the USA and then it defaults to show.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    You can bet they're selling it to AI companies for training, too.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 weeks ago

    They‘re Discord. They‘re selling all their data in basically real time to anyone who wants it. If there‘s a Discord user someone wants to know more about they can just pay like 5 bucks to a service and get their entire chat history. That stuff is automated.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

    Discord is owned by Microsoft, a huge proponent of AI. So, yeah.

    Edited to add, I was mistaken! Discord turned down Microsoft's buyout.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    As much as I would normally hate something like this, the way so many projects are based on discord (and how unsearchable discord messages are) make this really convenient

    Probably the worst solution, but maybe it'll also get people off discord?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago*

    google couldnt rely on reddit to scrape AI data, because its been taken over by said AI slop. google needed a new source of datamining. thats why reddit is becoming increasingly aggressive into forcing logins.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago* (8 children)

    Now lemmy servers need to do the same.

    Maybe some do, but they never show up in search queries whenever I tried. I even filtered by sites.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I see Lemmy/Piefed results through DuckDuckGo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I'm using DuckDuckGo too, which server are you seeing on the results? I'll try to filter specifically for that in the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    PieFed.social, but I've occasionally seen some lemmy.world ones as well.

    For example, just try searching for: "starcitizen steamdeck guide"

    And third result currently goes to PieFed (a PieFed.social account posting to a Lemmy.world community).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    A lot of lemmy servers have Human Verification in front of them maybe that’s why?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Could whitelist specific search engine crawlers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    The bots will pretend to be search engine crawlers. And not all have their own IP ranges.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    A lot of article websites whitelist Google's crawler, right? Can't that be done on a domain-basis? Or maybe have some kind of authentication-based system 🤔, I guess that would require the crawlers to be refactored though

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago

    What about past comments on a server that was public before this change came into place? I have no idea if any of the servers I commented on roughly 6 years ago were public. They were free servers for people playing WoW, and some had passwords and some didn't. I didn't make any controversial comments, but I also didn't (knowingly) consent to anything I typed being publicly searchable.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago

    Unpopular opinion: discord being inacessible from the web is a feature not a bug and I hope this is opt in on a per server basis.

    The fact that you can't read the posts from a discord community without joining the server and there is no cross-server "all" or "front-page" means you have to decide to join and decide to in that moment look at that server, so you wind up with more focused communities around specific interests.

    No raiding from other platforms because no direct links, no product placement since few people will see it, no content creators posting clickbait slop trying to go viral etc. etc.

    I'm not going to pretend discord is perfect, but I have had better conversations there than any other social media platform

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    So, they just gonna use the discord messages as fuel for train AI...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    If there's no choice in this, it is bad. If "servers" are allowed to opt-in, and users are interrupted with a warning before posting on a "server" that has changed the setting, it's possibly good.

    I know Discord messages have never been secure, but that doesn't mean it hasn't been a place people treated as private. Suddenly making messages accessible is like replacing all the bathroom stall dividers with transparent partitions: never was secure from a real threat, but there was a heightened expectation of privacy.

    There are a lot of fandoms and communities and support groups with the intent to be public and having those indexed by your favorite search index will bring value, just like public web fora of the past and reddit (even ex-Twitter) before extreme monetization and slopification. But, changing any shared information or thoughts from inaccessible to accessible is virtually guaranteed to cause harm via unwanted disclosure and those harm could be irreparable and impossible to balance with the benefits of accessibility.

    This news is mixed, with a side of anxiety. I'm not really sure what's going to show up in my Discord history.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Yayyy!! More search result pollution!

  • source