all 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 145 points 1 year ago (7 children)

So they hid everything implicating trump, and trump yelling about releasing files now is because he knows his buddies kash and bongino have confirmed this. We can assume anything released with Trump's approval has been doctored or has relevant info removed.

Trump diddled kids.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 93 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Trump diddled kids.

    Don't sugarcoat it like that. Donald J Trump repeatedly raped children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Convicted Felon Child Rapist donald trump

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    1,000 people is a lot to involve in the coverup.
    The more people involved the more likely it is that someone spills the details.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I’m betting they are all vetted cult members and will not turn on dear leader.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Did they do their darnedest to pick only people who are true believers? No doubt. Is that a property that's perfectly ascertainable and immutable? Absolutely not.

    The number of people increases the difficulty of hiding a conspiracy, but so does the time scale. I suspect we'll know a lot more than we do now in 20 years about this, for whatever that's worth.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Doesn't that just scream government efficiency to you?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    1000 agents who could have been investigating crimes on behalf of victims. Instead, they were tasked with protecting a perpetrator.

    e: also, jesus christ, how much work should it take to investigate and flag one ’innocent’ person’s references? 1,000 agents? How many man-hours is that? The man-hours that could have been spent for victims is one unconscionable thing – but how many man-hours should it take to bury this? That’s staggering. I thought we mostly knew what was in these files, but I’d also think 10 agents would be more than enough. What the fuck are we missing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    If they spent just one business day on this, that'd be 8000 man hours, at least as I understand it.

    Stretch that out to a single agent working standard work weeks (40 hours) that breaks down to 200 work weeks for a single agent.

    That is almost 4 years of work for a single agent, assuming no vacations or other time off (illness, car trouble, etc)

    I don't know if that helps you quantify it, but it helped put it in perspective for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 68 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I feel like we're all glossing over the part where Epstein got murdered in his jail cell and the video recordings from the prison were manipulated while Trump was in charge (with Bill Barr in charge of the prison system and to such an extent that he was using prison guards as personal police for Trump).

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago

    1000 people pouring over docs that like a week ago "didn't exist" and were a "hoax" just to burn the ones with Trump's name on them seems to indicate there's either 1) a fuck tonne of documents or 2) Trump is mentioned a fuck tonne in those documents.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    That’s a pretty significant doc review team.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The fake.FBI did not find anything about Trump in their files.

    And there never was any FBI files anyway!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    1000 agents who should be jailed.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    What does he need that many agents for? Strg+f, Donald Trump, enter.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • “Whistleblower”

    Sure.

  • source
  • [+] -21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I just don't believe anything about this case either way.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I believe Trump and Epstein were friends, and that Trump is a rapist, and that Trump knew Epstein was trafficking and raping children, because those are all things Trump has admitted or confirmed out loud into a microphone on camera. I don't need additional proof of any of those things, but I would not be surprised to learn that it exists in the Epstein files.

    Trump also denied all of those things, but that's not he said/she said where you have to present both sides as though they are equal. A man who constantly changes his story is not a credible source of information, and his denials can be dismissed outright.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment