you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

1000 agents who could have been investigating crimes on behalf of victims. Instead, they were tasked with protecting a perpetrator.

e: also, jesus christ, how much work should it take to investigate and flag one ’innocent’ person’s references? 1,000 agents? How many man-hours is that? The man-hours that could have been spent for victims is one unconscionable thing – but how many man-hours should it take to bury this? That’s staggering. I thought we mostly knew what was in these files, but I’d also think 10 agents would be more than enough. What the fuck are we missing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    If they spent just one business day on this, that'd be 8000 man hours, at least as I understand it.

    Stretch that out to a single agent working standard work weeks (40 hours) that breaks down to 200 work weeks for a single agent.

    That is almost 4 years of work for a single agent, assuming no vacations or other time off (illness, car trouble, etc)

    I don't know if that helps you quantify it, but it helped put it in perspective for me.

  • source
  • parent