no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
8 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

It will just get Chinese engineers H1-B visas and bring them to America instead. Problem solved.

  • source
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago

    Great. Next can we stop using Microsoft for defense department computer systems?

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I never would never have expected them to be using China based engis on defence systems thats wild. No wonder they got cooked by salt typhoon.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Outsourcing your Defense Department to a foreign country is a choice. Not a smart choice, but a choice nonetheless.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    What Microsoft did was absolutely inexcusable.

    But, really, not just for this alone.

    As for the DoD enlisting Microsoft, given the latter's decades-spanning horrible reputation, I don't know what to say.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago
    2 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    stopped

    Curious how they got around normal ITAR restrictions, or if they just didn't give a fuck before.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I'm willing to bet it's option B. Bet someone in management decided it would be best to cheap the fuck out now and then beg forgiveness later, and sell it as increasing security, than ask permission from the beginning.

  • source
  • parent
  • 1 comment in c/politics@sh.itjust.works view that post
    [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago

    wtf is going on? Hegseth announces shit on X and then Microsoft responds?

  • source