cross-posted from: https://feddit.online/c/uk@feddit.online/p/2035976/uk-to-ban-3-types-of-extreme-pornography-from-next-month-choking-incest-and-pretending

The government recognises the harm that some forms of pornography can have in shaping real-world behaviour, including by normalising harmful or illegal sexual behaviour. That is why it has criminalised the possession and publication of particularly harmful forms of pornography, including material depicting strangulation or suffocation, sex between certain relatives (‘incest porn’), and adults roleplaying as children under 16. These offences tackle pornography that risks normalising conduct that is harmful or illegal in real life, such as child sexual abuse.

all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 2 weeks ago

Oh no, pornography???? Clutches pearls in front of my Epstein files????

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago

    Ban everything but clothed missionary. Clothing must cover 80% of the body at all times.

    Pixelate any signs of enjoyment (including erections and fluids). Neo-Brittany must be kept safe, and carry on.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

    Yeah, but is STEPcest excluded? Because “oh no step bro” is definitely reading between the folds.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    God I wish. I am so tired of step-relations in every. Fucking. Video.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    it's starting to get bizzare too. "My stepsister's friend! My stepdad's business associate! My stepmom's drinking buddy!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

    The theory I heard is that it carries the taboo of someone close to you without being actual incest. People like the "forbidden fruit" aspect of fantasizing about someone they have a close non-sexual relationship with, like their coworker or neighbor or friend or whatever, but those relationships don't really translate as taboo when it's not your coworker or neighbor or friend or whatever. So step-relations are used as a broad stand-in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    I hate these things, but this is stupid. IDK if it's constitutional in the UK, but it wouldn't get past the 1st amendment in the US.

    Well, that's assuming the acts are legal in the location they are being performed. Real incest is illegal in most states. Not that I believe any of what they call incest in porn is actually incest.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago

    Yeah incest is for royals only!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    How about they cut Prince Andrews balls off for raping children

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

    I mean, I'm all for this, ~~but why not scat, bestiality, blood, rape, etc. while they're at it? I mean, ffs already. Half-assed half-measures, per usual.usual.

    Happily incorrect. 🙇🏼‍♂️

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    Back the Victorian era you go idiots!

    Sure helps distract from Epstein, smart!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    Why even bother with this moral posturing when VPNs exist. This affects no one who is interested in viewing that content.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    That the three even exist to begin with is fucking disgusting.

  • source