1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

We have people saying "ahh" and "unalived", we can't see a meme without a word being blocked out, and we have to scan ID's to get online. All of that was to protect children. And now we have to explain to the kids that, despite all the protections, they still may see something that will harm them?

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/parenting@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Honestly this is over due. It's been simple enough to find graphic war videos or beheadings for some time. If you give you kid unfiltered access to the web or even YouTube they can find it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Yeah I've definitely had conversations with my kid about the darker stuff that is on the internet. It's a little bit of a different conversation when it's our own government providing the killings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    Can't show porn to the kiddos. Beheadings are totally fine tho

    Jfc pedo billionaires and religion have ruined this country

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    Inb4 conservatives suggesting 're-education' camps for children who (for reasons unknown /s) might have problems seeing a live execution.

  • source