This is not an article about politics, capital punishment or whether the Fort Hood shooter deserves to be executed in public for his crimes.

Instead, it’s focused on the unprecedented parental challenge of handling the near-certain prospect that children will hear of or see footage of the Dec. 3 U.S. execution by firing squad of Nidal Malik Hasan if the Trump administration follows through with plans to livestream the event.

The danger stretches beyond the broadcast itself, because history shows graphic video from the event could be clipped, copied and pushed into children’s social feeds even if the original stream is restricted.

Experts suggest that grownups who care about children start by setting aside matters of politics and public policy — like the Nov. 3 U.S. midterm elections and the debate over capital punishment. Focus instead on how witnessing someone’s death by firing squad might land with young viewers — and how best to reassure and protect them.

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Honestly this is over due. It's been simple enough to find graphic war videos or beheadings for some time. If you give you kid unfiltered access to the web or even YouTube they can find it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Yeah I've definitely had conversations with my kid about the darker stuff that is on the internet. It's a little bit of a different conversation when it's our own government providing the killings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    Can't show porn to the kiddos. Beheadings are totally fine tho

    Jfc pedo billionaires and religion have ruined this country

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    Inb4 conservatives suggesting 're-education' camps for children who (for reasons unknown /s) might have problems seeing a live execution.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/gestapo_usa@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    We have people saying "ahh" and "unalived", we can't see a meme without a word being blocked out, and we have to scan ID's to get online. All of that was to protect children. And now we have to explain to the kids that, despite all the protections, they still may see something that will harm them?

  • source