all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 19 points 1 month ago

hitting cinemas simultaneously in April 2028

So, one month before The Resurrection of the Christ: Part Two, which will finally answer the question: are The Beatles bigger than Jesus???

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Do the Beatles still have enough fans under 60 to justify 4 films in theaters at once?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Seems like a decent strategy as people will likely want to watch the others after watching one of them. Same goes for binging a whole new season of a show on any given streaming platform.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    See that’s the thing: this idea is tailor made for streaming. I can’t imagine too many people shelling out four theater tickets for this in the current economy. It’s an interesting premise from a film/art standpoint though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    That aspect is a bit odd and I wonder how anything short of a megaplex is even going to be able to screen these four films on top of whatever else is out at the time. We do have a local independent theater that only charges $6-$8 per ticket and has two beers and a large popcorn for $20 so we go at least once or twice a month but they only have three theaters so this would probably be a no-go for them. I admittedly didn't read the article and assumed this would be available on streaming as well since it would be such a good fit.

  • source
  • parent