Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ spending cuts will be fully felt next year, but hospitals are already feeling the squeeze

Archived version: https://archive.is/20261011120834/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/11/medicaid-cuts-maternity-wards


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 1 month ago

Spending cuts to be fully felt in the year that Dems are set to take over Congress.... Where have I seen this one before??;?!!?!

  • source
  • doubt that is become less women are getting pregnant,

    and it's more than more pregnant women can't access healthcare.

    3rd world country

  • source
  • 12 comments in c/health@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    Yep. The loss leader of medicine. Heavily reliant on Medicaid. Heavy lean on 60% Medicaid as base income for rural areas. Even then, no Medicaid reimbursement covers the cost of birth.

    Republicans really do hate women.

    The signs should read Republicans kill babies and mothers. To get the appropriate level of head spin.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    About 40% of births in the US are paid for by Medicaid

    RTFA

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    60% isn’t referencing births it’s referencing total hospital income source. Baseline income for the whole building. This varies, of course, but the general numbers used are 60% rural, 30% urban. “Ish” on both.

    As such, house wide cuts will be made to make up for the loss.

    I was supplementing the article.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    That is not what the article says, so I would be interested in knowing where you got that information.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago

    Life knowledge is not summarized by an OP article. It’s why we all hop into the comments and do this discuss.online thing.

    Because I enjoy discussing healthcare and think it’s important, I’ll add some easy sources.

    Here’s a basic, with charts. More or less a healthcare data brokerage site. Here, the combined Medicare/Medicaid is listed at 44%, but it’s important to understand this is an average between both rural and urban hospitals. The number goes up in rural areas and down in urban areas, for reasons I already stated. TLDR, most surgeons and specialists don’t want to live in a tiny town with limited clientele numbers, and those are the MDs that bring in extra above and beyond money.

    https://www.kff.org/health-costs/key-facts-about-hospitals/?entry=national-hospital-spending-spending-by-payer

    Even so, consider, even at 44%, for arguments sake, cutting into 44% of anyone’s income is going to create an unpleasant reaction.

    If you keep scrolling through those numbers, you’ll find the trend is already for hospital closures. 2010-2023 are their numbers. Cutting Medicaid and/or Medicare only speeds that up. And, naturally, the loss leader of medicine (birth centers) go first.

    Now, if you click over to their rural data, you’ll find the over 60% reliance on Medicare and Medicaid number.

    https://www.kff.org/health-costs/key-facts-about-hospitals?entry=rural-hospitals-rural-discharges-by-payer

    Along with some rural hospital data.

    Here’s a research article that discusses the underpaid / uncompensated problem.

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10924546/

    Rural areas often can’t and don’t pay, or underpay. Bear in mind, every Medicaid payer in a birth center underpays because the benefit doesn’t cover the cost of giving birth.

    It’s also important to remember that not all of your medical money goes to greedy CEOs. It pays for janitors, intake specialists, MDs, nurses, nurses aides, security (you want security in your hospital), scrub techs, respiratory therapists, phlebotomists, med techs running those labs, radiology, ultrasound, and a bunch of other stuff. A sizeable portion of those skilled people have incredible college debt to pay back to even be there. It’s not a charity, it can’t be when the skilled labor in the place relies on paychecks from it to live.

    And here’s a general news style article if that’s more your thing.
    https://rollingout.com/2026/09/07/6-facts-medicaid-cuts-hitting-hospitals/

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    The Murder Party is doing its thing again.

  • source
  • [+] -10 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Doulas are an emotional support that medical care doesn't provide and are great in addition to medical care. They are not relevant here because doulas do not provide medical care and are not a solution for lack of medical services.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    No.

    Just because a doula could potentially be "the only resource" to deliver a baby, doesnt mean it is safe, or healthy.

    You want infant/mother mortality to go up? Because thats how you kill babies and mothers.

    Had there not been a medical doctor available at my birth, both my mother & me would have died the day I was born. My son and I might not have made it, now that I think on it.

    Giving birth is terrifying enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 1 comment in c/wildfeed@sh.itjust.works view that post
    [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    See how much the GOP loves women and children?

  • source