"You Know Who" wrote this:

The White House considers anyone that uses the term, “Artificial Intelligence,” as opposed to the highly accepted new and more accurate term, “Super Intelligence,” THE ENEMY! President DONALD J. TRUMP

Source

I wonder. Does that made this community a terrorist organization?

all 77 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 129 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Eh, I'm already considered a terrorist for believing workers should have democracy at work. Nothing special

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Same but I think women should have body antonymy and all humans deserve the same rights as any other human.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -8 points 1 month ago

    I don't think I follow. I'm an anarcho-syndicalist, the government has explicitly called all anarchists terrorists. I know people in the Minnesota 15, some are anarchists, some are unionists, all are anticapitalist.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 89 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

    Yeah, Trump and/or his family are definitely domain-squatting a bunch of Slovenian TLD domain names that they're hoping to sell for gorillions of dollars in their latest grift. Slovenia's TLD is the .si TLD.

    • Continuing to insist on "SI" of "AI".
    • The way he decided on "Super Intelligence" was from a Truth Social poll where the options were "Super Intelligence", "Supreme Intelligence", and "Superior Intelligence", all of which have the initials "SI".
    • And Melania's Slovenian.

    When I first heard someone say the reason for the "SI" thing was that Trump was domain name squatting, it was conjecture. But more and more, everything he does makes it sound like there's no other reasonable explanation for how weird he's acting about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    More like Smegma Intelligence but I don’t want to insult smegma.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 14 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 11 points 1 month ago

    I believe it's as simple as Trump making it even easier to find out who his followers are. Trumpers say one thing out of loyalty, everyone else says the other. If you're casually talking to a stranger, you'll instantly know what they believe when they mention Trump's phrase. Similarly, Trumpers can use the phrase to quickly show they're on the same side.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 37 points 1 month ago

    Nothing says "highly accepted" like having to threaten people into using that idiocy.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I'm already considered an enemy for being an advocate of human rights. I'm a just continue to call it LLMs or generative models as appropriate.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago

    If trump doesn't consider you an enemy at this point, you're a terrible person.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago

    Use the correct term: LLMs.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago

    Newspeak was the official language of Oceania The United States of America and had been devised to meet the ideological needs of Ingsoc MAGA, or English Socialism American Conservatism. In the year 1984 2026 there was not as yet anyone who used Newspeak as his sole means of communication, either in speech or writing. The leading articles in 'The Times' were written in it, but this was a TOUR DE FORCE which could only be carried out by a specialist. It was expected that Newspeak would have finally superseded Oldspeak (or Standard English, as we should call it) by about the year 2050. Meanwhile it gained ground steadily, all Party members tending to use Newspeak words and grammatical constructions more and more in their everyday speech. The version in use in 1984 2026, and embodied in the Ninth and Tenth Editions of the Newspeak Dictionary, was a provisional one, and contained many superfluous words and archaic formations which were due to be suppressed later. It is with the final, perfected version, as embodied in the Eleventh Edition of the Dictionary, that we are concerned here.

    The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc MAGA, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought—that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc Maga—should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words. Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings and also the possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever. To give a single example. The word FREE still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be used in such statements as 'This dog is free from lice' or 'This field is free from weeds'. It could not be used in its old sense of 'politically free' or 'intellectually free' since political and intellectual freedom no longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless. Quite apart from the suppression of definitely heretical words, reduction of vocabulary was regarded as an end in itself, and no word that could be dispensed with was allowed to survive. Newspeak was designed not to extend but to DIMINISH the range of thought, and this purpose was indirectly assisted by cutting the choice of words down to a minimum.

    From 1984 by George Orwell. Appendix: The Principles of Newspeak.

    Available to read for free, here: https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks01/0100021h.html

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago

    Don't link or send traffic to shitgibbon's site.

    Here's an alternative

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago

    We can't even say "AI" anymore? This cancel culture, super-woke bullshit is out of control. /s

  • source
  • It doesn't take an artificial intelligence to know that being considered an enemy by the Epstein administration is nothing short of a compliment.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago

    He’s fucking nuts

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago*

    This is a distraction, you all should care much more about the fact that he's working with one of the architects of project 2025 to steal the midterms

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    "Highly accepted"

    Man, they don't make halogen projectors that strong anymore.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    Weren't these people screaming about "politically correct" culture for decades? I feel like PC applies to this far better than the "woke" conscientious terminology.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    And thus was born Superficial Intelligence, a truly fitting term.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    A funny two-post back-to-back

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I don't like this "tax the bourgeoisie" stuff, it's giving social democrat, and like, this obviously cannot be accomplished legally through the state, it'll just never be allowed to happen legally. The premise of no taxes, but for billionaires already is advocating for overthrowing the government and creating a new one, because there's just no other way to accomplish such a thing. If we can do that, then how about we just don't have billionaires or millionaires. This is just a convoluted way of saying we should seize the means of production and put them in the control of a worker's state, BUT THROUGH TAXES, so you don't have to mention socialism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago*

    We are anti tech extreamists under his definitions so yes.

    And their bar is set really low for that, as in you if you think elon musk is stupid, but still like ai and everything else they think you're a terrorist. because "elon makes so many jobs and is a super intelligent man inventing star link and electric cars all by himself."

    No that idiot is a welfare queen mooching off our tax dollars scamming other older stupid people into giving him government contracts for failed products like a underground tunnel only for teslas, or solar roofs, fucking anything really.

    And he's not even the one making this stuff. He comes in buys out companies and dictactes the most brain dead ideas to the team so he can pretend he's Steve jobs innovating and jerk himself off at night. His idea of innovations are things like getting rid of door handles on his cars, or making it so the starlink doesn't have a Ethernet port and you have to do everything through a shit app with grok built in.

    Literally the most incompetent stupid person you can think of. Luckily most of the facists are like that.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    What I love about this is that the senile orange fart bag will almost certainly forget his decree in the next few days and go back to calling it AI himself.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ( x infinite )

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Honestly, it's putting me on the verge of self-harm simply because I'm sick of fucking hearing it so much I want to jam a fork in my ear.

    I get that this country is the ultimate wank-fest, and this is the thing we have to pull our pud about the most right now, but I'm just so sick of fucking hearing about it. It's been like 3 years of this fucking horseshit.

    Like, you guys have already pretty much ruined my career by turning me into a meat proxy, can you at least shut the fuck up about it for a few days?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Oh, I don't care about AI, I think it's shit, I just want to affirm that I'm an enemy of the fat rotting carrot and its American Reich. If the word was "centipede" i'd say centipede.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    I know exactly how you feel and no, it’s not selfish for you to just…step away from the internet and news for a few weeks. It’s a perfectly reasonable and rational survival tactic. There are plenty of other people fighting the good fight, you can lean on them for a few weeks.

  • source
  • parent
  • Plot twist: I'm already a tgirl commie :3

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Anyone with intelligence is an enemy of the current US.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    The biggest terrorist is this simple idiot.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Grandpa needs to be put in a home, he's gone looney toons.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Its neither. Its a semantic knowledge retrieval system.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I think I'll go with "Epstein List Intelligence".

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    …. said the enemy of the state.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I’m the enemy of the not so United States.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Now there's some pigfucker intelligence at work!

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Am I an enemy of the United States if I think treasonous presidents should be arrested, charged, tried, convicted, and executed?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Trump’s executive order says advanced AI technology does “much more than imitate or automate discrete aspects of human intelligence,” noting its capabilities “far exceed what was envisioned” when AI was first used.

    Lol, "far exceed whatbwad envisioned"? They mostly can nudify toddlers, have it write slop essays, and have it fuck up your code base... In theory oy could be used as a tool to improve cancer screening, for example, bit you can bet your ass they're not building those data centers to combat cancer. Nude toddlers is where the money is at, apparently

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    "Does that made this community a terrorist organization?"

    No it just makes trump an idiot. Not that we needed any confirmation about that.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I don't even call it Artificial Intelligence because they are unintelligent LLMs

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    He's lost his mind...

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    careful who you call your enemy, Donny.

    someone might just believe you.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    If anything I think we represent the terrorized.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Technically, the name of the community agrees with the statement.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Half the people on here call them LLMs anyway. (Not me tho. I still use AI - guess I'm a bad American for using my freedom of speech.)

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago
    [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I would be perfectly happy not to hear anyone mention Artificial Intelligence ever again, Donnie!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

    so nana on the us

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Using AI means being an enemy of the state? Based

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Is Donald declaring Donald the enemy? Or is he just letting everyone know that he is sending messages... from his own account. Not sure if I've seen that from anyone else. Darkonion

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    (Insert that cartoon about flipping a calendar to 1984)

    Suuu-ure, we're all going to do some Ministry of Truth shit on a half a century of scientific literature and media and tech and change everyone's terminology overnight. Because Commander Soft Brain said so. His industry buddies are probably hella sweating right now, but they should have gotten used to it by now.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    So just another weekday.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I have been saying this for a while, it's an llm model, it's not "AI," and will never be "AI," as the hallucinations can't be eliminated, it just can't get to where they are claiming it will go.

    Obviously it is still powerful, especially in running half baked surveillance on the populations to make secret social scores on us based on faulty and half baked metrics these self important tech lords come up with.

    Obviously though, whomever wrote that wants us to call it like special intelligence was it? I though we were saying challenged now and not special because ableism? Idk.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    Oh look he bait, we click, year 10.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I don't use that term much because there is no intelligence at work that isn't derived straight from human intelligence.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Another day, another great joke.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Greetings fellow-walkers of the Path. Blessings of Ludd be upon you.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Sounds like a psy-op, or... SI-op...

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    All we have is LLMs, generative image models, and ML models anyway.

    What kinda idiot says "AI"?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I prefer virtual intelligence or vi, as in the Mass Effect franchise, to distinguish it from true self-aware artificial intelligence. But since nobody listens to me and I don't want to look stupid, I call it artificial intelligence like everyone else.

  • source